95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17378123)
1. [The comparison of the angles of doppler wave spectrum of blood flow in tumor vessels in case of adnexal masses].
Fuchs T; Pomorski M; Wiatrowski A; Slejman N; Zimmer M
Ginekol Pol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):848-52. PubMed ID: 17378123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Color Doppler blood flow measurements and microvessel density assessment in ovarian tumors].
Czekierdowski A; Szymański M; Szumiło J; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):695-700. PubMed ID: 14674110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses with transvaginal ultrasonography and colour blood flow imaging.
Sawicki W; Spiewankiewicz B; Cendrowski K; Stelmachów J
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2001; 22(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 11446479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Studies on angiogenesis in the benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms with the use of color and pulsed Doppler sonography and serum CA-125, CA-19.9, CA-72.4 and vascular endothelial growth factor measurements.
Czekierdowski A
Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2002; 57(1):113-31. PubMed ID: 12898913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions with contrast-enhanced transvaginal ultrasonography.
Szymanski M; Socha MW; Kowalkowska ME; Zielińska IB; Eljaszewicz A; Szymanski W
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Nov; 131(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 26254725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical assessment of selected vascularization attributes of adnexal masses in preoperative prediction of tumor malignancy].
Witczak K; Szpurek D; Moszyński R; Sroka Ł; Sajdak S
Ginekol Pol; 2007 May; 78(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 17867328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ovarian masses: can benign and malignant lesions be differentiated with color and pulsed Doppler US?
Brown DL; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Doubilet PM; Benson CB; Waitzkin ED; Muto MG
Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 8284377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A critical analysis of Doppler velocimetry in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign ovarian masses.
Marchesini AC; Magrio FA; Berezowski AT; Neto OB; Nogueira AA; Candido dos Reis FJ
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2008; 17(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 18240986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: differences in blood flow impedance in benign and malignant lesions.
Hamper UM; Sheth S; Abbas FM; Rosenshein NB; Aronson D; Kurman RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1225-8. PubMed ID: 8498222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical value estimation of the Doppler indicies: PI, RI and PSV, TAMXV and MEDV in early differentiation of the ovarian tumors malignancy].
Szpurek D; Moszyński R; Englert-Golon M; Pawlak M; Sajdak S
Ginekol Pol; 2006 Aug; 77(8):597-602. PubMed ID: 17076190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of intratumoural indices of blood flow velocity and impedance for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Tailor A; Jurkovic D; Bourne TH; Natucci M; Collins WP; Campbell S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996; 22(7):837-43. PubMed ID: 8923703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The use of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional color and power-Doppler in the diagnosis of blood flow indices of adnexal tumors].
Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smoleń A; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2006 Apr; 77(4):296-306. PubMed ID: 16875035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pre-operative assessment of benign and malignant ovarian tumours using colour Doppler ultrasonography.
Dasgupta S; Malty SP; Sharma PP; Mukhopadhyay A; Ghosh TK
J Indian Med Assoc; 2010 Aug; 108(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 21404744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of colour and pulsed Doppler US and tumour marker CA 125 in differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
Antonić J; Rakar S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1996; 17(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 8750512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transvaginal ultrasonography of pelvic masses: evaluation of B-mode technique and Doppler ultrasonography.
Rehn M; Lohmann K; Rempen A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 8694082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of resistive index versus pulsatility index in assessing the benign etiology of adnexal masses.
Angeid-Backman E; Coleman BG; Arger PH; Jacobs JE; Langer JE; Horii S
Clin Imaging; 1998; 22(4):284-91. PubMed ID: 9699050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathologic findings.
Jain KA
Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8134599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
