These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17378177)

  • 1. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.
    Hattori Y; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 69(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 17378177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of sound measurement systems for auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nam EC; Kim SS; Lee KU; Kim SS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 26(5):715-20. PubMed ID: 18440748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic FMRI noise: linear time-invariant system model.
    Rizzo Sierra CV; Versluis MJ; Hoogduin JM; Duifhuis HD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2115-23. PubMed ID: 18713680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nordell A; Lundh M; Horsch S; Hallberg B; Aden U; Nordell B; Blennow M
    Acta Paediatr; 2009 Aug; 98(8):1278-83. PubMed ID: 19432831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic noise characteristics of a 4 Telsa MRI scanner.
    More SR; Lim TC; Li M; Holland CK; Boyce SE; Lee JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Mar; 23(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 16463341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of passive acoustic screening: implications for the design of imager and MR-suite.
    Moelker A; Vogel MW; Pattynama PM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Feb; 17(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 12541235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Echo planar imaging at 4 Tesla with minimum acoustic noise.
    Tomasi DG; Ernst T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 12815648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Measurement of noise protection in functional magnetic resonance imaging].
    Liener K; Wunderlich A; Ehret G; Bachor E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 15712046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance of bone-conducted sound transmission on patient hearing in the MR scanner.
    Moelker A; Maas RA; Vogel MW; Ouhlous M; Pattynama PM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jul; 22(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 15971178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verbal communication in MR environments: effect of MR system acoustic noise on speech understanding.
    Moelker A; Maas RA; Pattynama PM
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 15220495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic noise analysis in echo planar imaging: multicenter trial and comparison with other pulse sequences.
    Miyati T; Banno T; Fujita H; Mase M; Narita H; Imazawa M; Ohba S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Aug; 18(8):733-6. PubMed ID: 10534055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporary Hearing Threshold Shift in Healthy Volunteers with Hearing Protection Caused by Acoustic Noise Exposure during 3-T Multisequence MR Neuroimaging.
    Jin C; Li H; Li X; Wang M; Liu C; Guo J; Yang J
    Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):602-608. PubMed ID: 28813235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise level and ultrasound spectra during burring.
    Sorainen E; Rytkönen E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2002 Sep; 6(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 12271344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Background MR gradient noise and non-auditory BOLD activations: a data-driven perspective.
    Haller S; Homola GA; Scheffler K; Beckmann CF; Bartsch AJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():74-83. PubMed ID: 19505438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single point imaging with suppressed sound pressure levels through gradient-shape adjustment.
    Latta P; Gruwel ML; Edie E; Srámek M; Tomanek B
    J Magn Reson; 2004 Oct; 170(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 15388078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interventional MR imaging at 1.5 T: quantification of sound exposure.
    Moelker A; Maas RA; Lethimonnier F; Pattynama PM
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):889-95. PubMed ID: 12202729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sound level dependence of auditory evoked potentials: simultaneous EEG recording and low-noise fMRI.
    Thaerig S; Behne N; Schadow J; Lenz D; Scheich H; Brechmann A; Herrmann CS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Mar; 67(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 17707939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Measurement of sound pressure level at outlet of external auditory canal and eardrum].
    Liu JL; Qin XL; Wang LH; Liang CY; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):353-5. PubMed ID: 14761398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.