These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17378297)
1. [Withholding treatment in terminally-ill newborns with Islamic parents]. Westra AE; Smit BJ; Willems DL Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Feb; 151(8):449-52. PubMed ID: 17378297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physician medical decision-making at the end of life in newborns: insight into implementation at 2 Dutch centers. Verhagen AA; van der Hoeven MA; van Meerveld RC; Sauer PJ Pediatrics; 2007 Jul; 120(1):e20-8. PubMed ID: 17606544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. End-of-life decision making in neonates and infants: comparison of The Netherlands and Belgium (Flanders). Vrakking AM; van der Heide A; Provoost V; Bilsen J; van der Wal G; Deliens L Acta Paediatr; 2007 Jun; 96(6):820-4. PubMed ID: 17537009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Withholding and withdrawing of life sustaining treatment in the newborn. Tripp J; McGregor D Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2006 Jan; 91(1):F67-71. PubMed ID: 16371392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical end-of-life decisions for children in the Netherlands. Vrakking AM; van der Heide A; Arts WF; Pieters R; van der Voort E; Rietjens JA; Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD; van der Maas PJ; van der Wal G Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Sep; 159(9):802-9. PubMed ID: 16143738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Insight into end-of-life decisions in newborns in Flanders, Belgium]. Verhagen AA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Feb; 150(7):355-7. PubMed ID: 16523796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [No conspicuous changes in the practice of medical end-of-life decision-making for neonates and infants in the Netherlands in 2001 as compared to 1995]. Vrakking AM; van der Heide A; Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD; Keij-Deerenberg IM; van der Maas PJ; van der Wal G Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Sep; 149(37):2047-51. PubMed ID: 16184946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A careful course of action in a conflict regarding useful treatment of a newborn infant with severe brain damage]. van Beek RH; Buiting HP; de Haan FH; van Goudoever JB Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Nov; 149(48):2690-3. PubMed ID: 16358621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conflicts about end-of-life decisions in NICUs in the Netherlands. Verhagen AA; de Vos M; Dorscheidt JH; Engels B; Hubben JH; Sauer PJ Pediatrics; 2009 Jul; 124(1):e112-9. PubMed ID: 19564256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decisions to treat critically ill patients: a comparison of social versus medical considerations. Crane D Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1975; 53(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11663256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. End-of-life decision before and after birth: changing ethical considerations. Pinter AB J Pediatr Surg; 2008 Mar; 43(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 18358277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Caring for newborns: three world views. In Japan, parents participate but doctors decide. Kimura R Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Aug; 16(4):22-3. PubMed ID: 3744796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical ethics and the stewardship of life. Koop CE; Forbes C Christ Today; 1978 Dec; 23(6):8-14. PubMed ID: 11663969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rejecting the Baby Doe rules and defending a "negative" analysis of the Best Interests Standard. Kopelman LM J Med Philos; 2005 Aug; 30(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16029986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]