These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17378412)

  • 1. The configural advantage in object change detection persists across depth rotation.
    Favelle SK; Hayward WG; Burke D; Palmisano S
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Nov; 68(8):1254-63. PubMed ID: 17378412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The time course of configural change detection for novel 3-D objects.
    Favelle S; Palmisano S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):999-1012. PubMed ID: 20436196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rotation direction affects object recognition.
    Vuong QC; Tarr MJ
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1717-30. PubMed ID: 15136006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual representation of malleable and rigid objects that deform as they rotate.
    Kourtzi Z; Shiffrar M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Apr; 27(2):335-55. PubMed ID: 11318051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Face viewpoint effects about three axes: the role of configural and featural processing.
    Favelle SK; Palmisano S; Avery G
    Perception; 2011; 40(7):761-84. PubMed ID: 22128550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Viewpoint dependency in object representation and recognition.
    Liu Z
    Spat Vis; 1996; 9(4):491-521. PubMed ID: 8774091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Qualitative differences in the representation of spatial relations for different object classes.
    Cooper EE; Brooks BE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 15053686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of configural 3D object recognition.
    Rentschler I; Jüttner M; Osman E; Müller A; Caelli T
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Feb; 149(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 14739015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociating viewpoint costs in mental rotation and object recognition.
    Hayward WG; Zhou G; Gauthier I; Harris IM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):820-5. PubMed ID: 17328379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate.
    Logothetis NK; Pauls J
    Cereb Cortex; 1995; 5(3):270-88. PubMed ID: 7613082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stereo disparity facilitates view generalization during shape recognition for solid multipart objects.
    Cristino F; Davitt L; Hayward WG; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(12):2419-36. PubMed ID: 25679983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A; Reid SL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Jun; 130(2):238-55. PubMed ID: 11409102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A stereo advantage in generalizing over changes in viewpoint on object recognition tasks.
    Bennett DJ; Vuong QC
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1082-93. PubMed ID: 17355033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.
    Lawson R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):911-30. PubMed ID: 19653738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceiving Object Shape from Specular Highlight Deformation, Boundary Contour Deformation, and Active Haptic Manipulation.
    Norman JF; Phillips F; Cheeseman JR; Thomason KE; Ronning C; Behari K; Kleinman K; Calloway AB; Lamirande D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149058. PubMed ID: 26863531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How does attention spread across objects oriented in depth?
    Reppa I; Fougnie D; Schmidt WC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):912-25. PubMed ID: 20436189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Priming of depth-rotated objects depends on attention and part changes.
    Thoma V; Davidoff J
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 16610271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rats (Rattus norvegicus) flexibly retrieve objects' non-spatial and spatial information from their visuospatial working memory: effects of integrated and separate processing of these features in a missing-object recognition task.
    Keshen C; Cohen J
    Anim Cogn; 2016 Jan; 19(1):91-107. PubMed ID: 26311419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. If you watch it move, you'll recognize it in 3D: Transfer of depth cues between encoding and retrieval.
    Papenmeier F; Schwan S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():90-5. PubMed ID: 26765253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. View-dependent object recognition by monkeys.
    Logothetis NK; Pauls J; Bülthoff HH; Poggio T
    Curr Biol; 1994 May; 4(5):401-14. PubMed ID: 7922354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.