These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17378452)

  • 1. Breakaway forces of flat and domed surfaced Magfit implant magnet attachments.
    Chopra V; Smith BJ; Preiskel HW; Palmer RM; Curtis R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Mar; 15(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 17378452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of sterilization on the retention properties of magnetic attachments for dental implants.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1206-11. PubMed ID: 19832767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The measurement of retentive forces in mandibular complete overdenture with Magfit magnetic attachments].
    Du L; Xu C; Chao Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):366-8. PubMed ID: 14650991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corrosion of dental magnet attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Ehring C; Morton D; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 19210309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
    Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of retentive anchor systems for overdentures.
    Svetlize CA; Bodereau EF
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jun; 35(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 15202589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corrosion resistance of iron-platinum magnets.
    Yiu EY; Fang DT; Chu FC; Chow TW
    J Dent; 2004 Aug; 32(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 15240060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Measurements of the flux densities of static magnetic fields generated by two types of dental magnetic attachments and their retentive forces].
    Xu C; Chao YL; Du L; Yang L
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 May; 35(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 15181852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retentive force of O-ring attachment to use Immediate Provisional Implant (IPI)-retained overdenture.
    Kobayashi M; Ohkubo C; Suzuki Y; Aoki T; Sato J; Hosoi T
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Dec; 13(4):147-9. PubMed ID: 16411569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of location and number of endosseous implants on retention and stability of magnetically retained mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Wahab LA; Sadig W
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):511-3. PubMed ID: 19149068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
    Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights.
    Abbo B; Razzoog ME; Vivas J; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18182182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic drive system for a new centrifugal rotary blood pump.
    Hilton A; Tansley G
    Artif Organs; 2008 Oct; 32(10):772-7. PubMed ID: 18959665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
    Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of repeated insertion-removal cycles on the force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachments: an in vitro study.
    Hao Z; Chao Y; Meng Y; Yin H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 24439071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of spatial arrangement and clinical service lifetime simulation on the retention of magnetic units used in implant-anchored orbital prostheses.
    Artopoulou II; Zinelis S; Lemon JC; Polyzois G; Chambers MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):811.e1-811.e9. PubMed ID: 36890002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.