These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1737880)

  • 1. Spectral integration of broadband signals in diotic and dichotic masking experiments.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):317-26. PubMed ID: 1737880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory filter bandwidths in binaural and monaural listening conditions.
    Kollmeier B; Holube I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1889-901. PubMed ID: 1401533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.
    Cokely JA; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1331-9. PubMed ID: 2030220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of across-frequency processes in dichotic listening conditions.
    Nitschmann M; Verhey JL; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3188-98. PubMed ID: 20000932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of temporal separation and masker level on binaural analysis in forward masking.
    Yama MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):327-35. PubMed ID: 1737881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between psychophysical "suppression effects" under diotic and dichotic listening conditions.
    Yama MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Nov; 72(5):1380-3. PubMed ID: 7175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NoSo and NoS pi detection as a function of masker bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Staffel JG; Hall JW; Grose JH; Pillsbury HC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1720-7. PubMed ID: 2341676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. I: Influence of signal and masker duration.
    Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1737-48. PubMed ID: 2262630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of interaural delay of the masker on masking-level differences in young and old adults.
    Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2129-35. PubMed ID: 1597604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Masker-bandwidth dependence in homophasic and antiphasic tone detection.
    Zurek PM; Durlach NI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 3558963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. II. Dependence on spectral parameters.
    Breebaart J; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1089-104. PubMed ID: 11519577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NoSo and NoS pi thresholds as a function of masker level for narrow-band and wideband masking noise.
    Hall JW; Harvey AD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Dec; 76(6):1699-703. PubMed ID: 6520307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical bandwidth determined by masking in the presence of two narrow-band noises.
    Ishigami H; Suzuki T; Isojima G
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1995; 22(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7677630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Signal detection in temporally modulated and spectrally shaped maskers.
    van den Brink WA; Houtgast T; Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):267-78. PubMed ID: 1737877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking at high frequencies.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):306-16. PubMed ID: 1737879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels.
    Stillman JA; Irwin RJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 2326150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. II: Influence of frequency and interaural-phase uncertainty.
    Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1749-56. PubMed ID: 2262631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.