BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17378881)

  • 1. Using clinical audit, qualitative data from patients and feedback from general practitioners to decrease delay in the referral of suspected colorectal cancer.
    Davies E; van der Molen B; Cranston A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Apr; 13(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 17378881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A single common urgent pathway for all colorectal referrals reduces time to diagnosis and treatment.
    Scott MA; Knight A; Brown K; Novell JR
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):766-71. PubMed ID: 17032322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Referral pathways in colorectal cancer: an audit of surgeons's records.
    Spigelman AD; Pascoe SW; Harris MF; Beilby JJ; Crossland LJ; Gett RM; Barton MB; Jayasinghe UW
    Aust Health Rev; 2013 Sep; 37(4):449-52. PubMed ID: 23850038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audit of acute referrals to the Department of Dermatology at Waikato Hospital: comparison with national access criteria for first specialist appointment.
    Stanway A; Oakley A; Rademaker M; Duffill M
    N Z Med J; 2004 Apr; 117(1192):U849. PubMed ID: 15107871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Referral letters to colorectal surgeons: the impact of peer-mediated feedback.
    Jiwa M; Walters S; Mathers N
    Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Feb; 54(499):123-6. PubMed ID: 14965392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients with colorectal cancer - a qualitative study of referral pathways and continuing care.
    Harris MF; Pascoe S; Crossland L; Beilby J; Veitch C; Spigelman A; Weller D
    Aust Fam Physician; 2012 Nov; 41(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 23145425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-week rule: has prioritisation of breast referrals by general practitioners improved?
    Imkampe A; Bendall S; Chianakwalam C
    Breast; 2006 Oct; 15(5):654-8. PubMed ID: 16580206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of audit and feedback and electronic referrals on the quality of primary care referral letters.
    Corwin P; Bolter T
    J Prim Health Care; 2014 Dec; 6(4):324-7. PubMed ID: 25485329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A baseline audit of referral and treatment delivered to patients in the intermediate minor oral surgery service in Croydon PCT.
    O'Neill E; Gallagher JE; Kendall N
    Prim Dent Care; 2012 Jan; 19(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 22244490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective audit of the implementation of the 2-week rule for assessment of suspected urological cancers.
    Coxon JP; Harris HJ; Watkin NA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Sep; 85(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 14594541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electronic referrals: what matters to the users.
    Warren J; Gu Y; Day K; White S; Pollock M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 178():235-41. PubMed ID: 22797047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Barriers to effective communication across the primary/secondary interface: examples from the ovarian cancer patient journey (a qualitative study).
    Farquhar MC; Barclay SI; Earl H; Grande GE; Emery J; Crawford RA
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2005 Sep; 14(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 16098121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Has the breast cancer 'two week wait' guarantee for assessment made any difference?
    Khawaja AR; Allan SM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Sep; 26(6):536-9. PubMed ID: 11034802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Referrals from general practice to consultants in Germany: if the GP is the initiator, patients' experiences are more positive.
    Rosemann T; Wensing M; Rueter G; Szecsenyi J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jan; 6():5. PubMed ID: 16423299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influencing referral practice using feedback of adherence to NICE guidelines: a quality improvement report for dyspepsia.
    Elwyn G; Owen D; Roberts L; Wareham K; Duane P; Allison M; Sykes A
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2007 Feb; 16(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 17301208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An audit of the quality and content of periodontal referrals and the effect of implementing referral criteria.
    Kourkouta S; Darbar UR
    Prim Dent Care; 2006 Jul; 13(3):99-106. PubMed ID: 16836813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-attendance at urgent referral appointments for suspected cancer: a qualitative study to gain understanding from patients and GPs.
    Jefferson L; Atkin K; Sheridan R; Oliver S; Macleod U; Hall G; Forbes S; Green T; Allgar V; Knapp P
    Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Dec; 69(689):e850-e859. PubMed ID: 31748378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic delay in colorectal cancer.
    Potter MA; Wilson RG
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1999 Oct; 44(5):313-6. PubMed ID: 10550956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer--do they work?
    Eccersley AJ; Wilson EM; Makris A; Novell JR
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Mar; 85(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 12648341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re-Audit of the Contents of GP Referral letters to General Adult Community Psychiatrists.
    Odelola C; Jabbar F
    Psychiatr Danub; 2017 Sep; 29(Suppl 3):607-609. PubMed ID: 28953838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.