435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17379579)
1. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.
Tourrière H; Pasero P
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):900-13. PubMed ID: 17379579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple pathways cooperate to facilitate DNA replication fork progression through alkylated DNA.
Vázquez MV; Rojas V; Tercero JA
DNA Repair (Amst); 2008 Oct; 7(10):1693-704. PubMed ID: 18640290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.
Lambert S; Carr AM
Biochimie; 2005 Jul; 87(7):591-602. PubMed ID: 15989976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint.
Meister P; Taddei A; Vernis L; Poidevin M; Gasser SM; Baldacci G
J Cell Biol; 2005 Feb; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 15716375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork.
Andreassen PR; Ho GP; D'Andrea AD
Carcinogenesis; 2006 May; 27(5):883-92. PubMed ID: 16490739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the roles of Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 at perturbed replication forks.
Osman F; Whitby MC
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):1004-17. PubMed ID: 17409028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bacterial DNA repair genes and their eukaryotic homologues: 5. The role of recombination in DNA repair and genome stability.
Nowosielska A
Acta Biochim Pol; 2007; 54(3):483-94. PubMed ID: 17893749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The DNA damage response during DNA replication.
Branzei D; Foiani M
Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2005 Dec; 17(6):568-75. PubMed ID: 16226452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response.
Jones RM; Petermann E
Biochem J; 2012 Apr; 443(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22417748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Roles of DNA polymerases in replication, repair, and recombination in eukaryotes.
Pavlov YI; Shcherbakova PV; Rogozin IB
Int Rev Cytol; 2006; 255():41-132. PubMed ID: 17178465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage-induced replication problems.
Budzowska M; Kanaar R
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2009; 53(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 19034694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A method to monitor replication fork progression in mammalian cells: nucleotide excision repair enhances and homologous recombination delays elongation along damaged DNA.
Johansson F; Lagerqvist A; Erixon K; Jenssen D
Nucleic Acids Res; 2004 Nov; 32(20):e157. PubMed ID: 15537835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Redundancy, insult-specific sensors and thresholds: unlocking the S-phase checkpoint response.
Cobb JA; Shimada K; Gasser SM
Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2004 Jun; 14(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 15172673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The DNA damage response during an unperturbed S-phase.
Ben-Yehoyada M; Gautier J; Dupré A
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):914-22. PubMed ID: 17374515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA replication and progression through S phase.
Takeda DY; Dutta A
Oncogene; 2005 Apr; 24(17):2827-43. PubMed ID: 15838518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methods to study replication fork collapse in budding yeast.
Liberi G; Cotta-Ramusino C; Lopes M; Sogo J; Conti C; Bensimon A; Foiani M
Methods Enzymol; 2006; 409():442-62. PubMed ID: 16793417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks.
Michel B; Grompone G; Florès MJ; Bidnenko V
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Aug; 101(35):12783-8. PubMed ID: 15328417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Caffeine delays replication fork progression and enhances UV-induced homologous recombination in Chinese hamster cell lines.
Johansson F; Lagerqvist A; Filippi S; Palitti F; Erixon K; Helleday T; Jenssen D
DNA Repair (Amst); 2006 Dec; 5(12):1449-58. PubMed ID: 16968677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posttranslational modifications of repair factors and histones in the cellular response to stalled replication forks.
Schleker T; Nagai S; Gasser SM
DNA Repair (Amst); 2009 Sep; 8(9):1089-100. PubMed ID: 19482523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methods for studying mutagenesis and checkpoints in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Kai M; Taricani L; Wang TS
Methods Enzymol; 2006; 409():183-94. PubMed ID: 16793402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
