These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1738046)

  • 1. Efficiency of stereopsis in random-dot stereograms.
    Harris JM; Parker AJ
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1992 Jan; 9(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 1738046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the apparent collapse of stereopsis in random-dot-stereograms at isoluminance.
    Kingdom FA; Simmons DR; Rainville S
    Vision Res; 1999 Jun; 39(12):2127-41. PubMed ID: 10343795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constraints on human stereo dot matching.
    Harris JM; Parker AJ
    Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(20):2761-72. PubMed ID: 7975312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. dmax for stereopsis and motion in random dot displays.
    Glennerster A
    Vision Res; 1998 Mar; 38(6):925-35. PubMed ID: 9624441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can random-dot stereograms serve as a model for the perception of depth in relation to real three-dimensional objects?
    Bishop PO
    Vision Res; 1996 May; 36(10):1473-7. PubMed ID: 8762764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The time course of 2-D shape discrimination in random dot stereograms.
    Glennerster A
    Vision Res; 1996 Jul; 36(13):1955-68. PubMed ID: 8759435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis.
    Johnston EB
    Vision Res; 1991; 31(7-8):1351-60. PubMed ID: 1891823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stereopsis with persisting and dynamic textures.
    Allison RS; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(28):3823-7. PubMed ID: 11090674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effects on depth perception and pattern recognition in random dot stereograms by changing the matrix dot density].
    Pressmar SB; Haase W
    Ophthalmologe; 2001 Oct; 98(10):955-9. PubMed ID: 11699317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of decorrelation on 3-D grating detection with static and dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Palmisano S; Allison RS; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 16307771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Read JC; Cumming BG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(34):8967-76. PubMed ID: 27559177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Associated phoria in relation to stereopsis with random-dot stereograms.
    Jiménez JR; Olivares JL; Pérez-Ocón F; del Barco LJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Jan; 77(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 10654858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays.
    Becker S; Bowd C; Shorter S; King K; Patterson R
    Vision Res; 1999 Jan; 39(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 10326139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal properties of disparity processing revealed by dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Perception; 2005; 34(10):1205-19. PubMed ID: 16309115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold.
    Smallman HS; MacLeod DI
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1994 Aug; 11(8):2169-83. PubMed ID: 7931758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: effects of spatial density and interocular delay.
    Cogan AI; Lomakin AJ; Rossi AF
    Vision Res; 1993 Sep; 33(14):1959-75. PubMed ID: 8249313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Local and global stereopsis in the horse.
    Timney B; Keil K
    Vision Res; 1999 May; 39(10):1861-7. PubMed ID: 10343877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stereopsis from motion-defined contours.
    Halpern DL
    Vision Res; 1991; 31(9):1611-7. PubMed ID: 1949629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the accuracy of surface reconstruction from disparity interpolation.
    Yang Y; Blake R
    Vision Res; 1995 Apr; 35(7):949-60. PubMed ID: 7762152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disparity-evoked vergence is driven by interocular correlation.
    Mallot HA; Roll A; Arndt PA
    Vision Res; 1996 Sep; 36(18):2925-37. PubMed ID: 8917794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.