These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17380508)

  • 1. Computational protocol for predicting the binding affinities of zinc containing metalloprotein-ligand complexes.
    Jain T; Jayaram B
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1167-78. PubMed ID: 17380508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An all atom energy based computational protocol for predicting binding affinities of protein-ligand complexes.
    Jain T; Jayaram B
    FEBS Lett; 2005 Dec; 579(29):6659-66. PubMed ID: 16307743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femtomolar Zn(II) affinity in a peptide-based ligand designed to model thiolate-rich metalloprotein active sites.
    Petros AK; Reddi AR; Kennedy ML; Hyslop AG; Gibney BR
    Inorg Chem; 2006 Dec; 45(25):9941-58. PubMed ID: 17140191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Docking studies of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors: zinc parameter optimization to improve the binding free energy prediction.
    Hu X; Shelver WH
    J Mol Graph Model; 2003 Nov; 22(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 12932782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.
    Amini A; Shrimpton PJ; Muggleton SH; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 17910057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling of metal interaction geometries for protein-ligand docking.
    Seebeck B; Reulecke I; Kämper A; Rarey M
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1237-54. PubMed ID: 18041759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
    Ferrara P; Gohlke H; Price DJ; Klebe G; Brooks CL
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
    Muegge I; Martin YC
    J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Large-scale validation of a quantum mechanics based scoring function: predicting the binding affinity and the binding mode of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes.
    Raha K; Merz KM
    J Med Chem; 2005 Jul; 48(14):4558-75. PubMed ID: 15999994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
    Pearlman DA; Rao BG; Charifson P
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PEARLS: program for energetic analysis of receptor-ligand system.
    Han LY; Lin HH; Li ZR; Zheng CJ; Cao ZW; Xie B; Chen YZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):445-50. PubMed ID: 16426079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities using multiple instance learning.
    Teramoto R; Kashima H
    J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Nov; 29(3):492-7. PubMed ID: 20965757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Solvated interaction energy (SIE) for scoring protein-ligand binding affinities. 1. Exploring the parameter space.
    Naïm M; Bhat S; Rankin KN; Dennis S; Chowdhury SF; Siddiqi I; Drabik P; Sulea T; Bayly CI; Jakalian A; Purisima EO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):122-33. PubMed ID: 17238257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A fast empirical GAFF compatible partial atomic charge assignment scheme for modeling interactions of small molecules with biomolecular targets.
    Mukherjee G; Patra N; Barua P; Jayaram B
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):893-907. PubMed ID: 21341292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Force fields including charge transfer and local polarization effects: Application to proteins containing multi/heavy metal ions.
    Sakharov DV; Lim C
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Jan; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 18566982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Zinc binding in proteins and solution: a simple but accurate nonbonded representation.
    Stote RH; Karplus M
    Proteins; 1995 Sep; 23(1):12-31. PubMed ID: 8539245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating protein-ligand binding free energy: atomic solvation parameters for partition coefficient and solvation free energy calculation.
    Pei J; Wang Q; Zhou J; Lai L
    Proteins; 2004 Dec; 57(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 15390269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deducing the energetic cost of protein folding in zinc finger proteins using designed metallopeptides.
    Reddi AR; Guzman TR; Breece RM; Tierney DL; Gibney BR
    J Am Chem Soc; 2007 Oct; 129(42):12815-27. PubMed ID: 17902663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A quantum mechanics-based scoring function: study of zinc ion-mediated ligand binding.
    Raha K; Merz KM
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Feb; 126(4):1020-1. PubMed ID: 14746460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An improved PMF scoring function for universally predicting the interactions of a ligand with protein, DNA, and RNA.
    Zhao X; Liu X; Wang Y; Chen Z; Kang L; Zhang H; Luo X; Zhu W; Chen K; Li H; Wang X; Jiang H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jul; 48(7):1438-47. PubMed ID: 18553962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.