These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17380763)

  • 21. Spinal fusion for low back pain; it's all over.
    Todd NV
    Br J Neurosurg; 2016 Oct; 30(5):588. PubMed ID: 27239945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evidence-based guidelines in lumbar spine surgery.
    Resnick DK; Groff MC
    Prog Neurol Surg; 2006; 19():123-134. PubMed ID: 17033151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An economic model of one-level lumbar arthroplasty versus fusion.
    Guyer RD; Tromanhauser SG; Regan JJ
    Spine J; 2007; 7(5):558-62. PubMed ID: 17588819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Instrumented fusions: a need for guidelines and research.
    Mark VH
    Surg Neurol; 2004 Apr; 61(4):318-9. PubMed ID: 15031064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Beastall J; Karadimas E; Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Hughes J; Smith F; Wardlaw D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lumbar disc arthroplasty: a critical review.
    Resnick DK; Watters WC
    Clin Neurosurg; 2007; 54():83-7. PubMed ID: 18504901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The positive effect of posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion is preserved at long-term follow-up: a RCT with 11-13 year follow-up.
    Andersen T; Videbaek TS; Hansen ES; Bünger C; Christensen FB
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Feb; 17(2):272-80. PubMed ID: 17851701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Significantly improved outcomes with a less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion incorporating total facetectomy.
    Kasis AG; Marshman LA; Krishna M; Bhatia CK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 19282736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Novel intradiscal biacuplasty (IDB) for the treatment of lumbar discogenic pain.
    Kapural L; Mekhail N
    Pain Pract; 2007 Jun; 7(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 17559482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Safety and efficacy of implant removal for patients with recurrent back pain after a failed degenerative lumbar spine surgery.
    Alanay A; Vyas R; Shamie AN; Sciocia T; Randolph G; Wang JC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jun; 20(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 17538350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Failure of the Wallis interspinous implant to lower the incidence of recurrent lumbar disc herniations in patients undergoing primary disc excision.
    Floman Y; Millgram MA; Smorgick Y; Rand N; Ashkenazi E
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul; 20(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 17607096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Re: Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
    Bonin A; Wu L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):1185. PubMed ID: 22252380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Posterior versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior tension band plating: retrospective analysis.
    Freudenberger C; Lindley EM; Beard DW; Reckling WC; Williams A; Burger EL; Patel VV
    Orthopedics; 2009 Jul; 32(7):492. PubMed ID: 19634851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature.
    Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Fusion therapy in back pain should be evaluated].
    Rehnqvist N; Erwald R
    Lakartidningen; 1998 Jul; 95(30-31):3282. PubMed ID: 9715059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
    Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outcomes of posterior fusion using pedicle screw fixation in patients >or=70 years with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Tokuhashi Y; Ajiro Y; Umezawa N
    Orthopedics; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1096. PubMed ID: 19226091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective: cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe, chronic low back pain.
    Soegaard R; Bünger CE; Christiansen T; Høy K; Eiskjaer SP; Christensen FB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):2405-14. PubMed ID: 18090078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The MRC spine stabilization trial: surgical methods, outcomes, costs, and complications of surgical stabilization.
    Wilson-MacDonald J; Fairbank J; Frost H; Yu LM; Barker K; Collins R; Campbell H;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(21):2334-40. PubMed ID: 18784631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.