409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17380801)
21. Microleakage in class II composite resin restorations: total bonding and open sandwich technique.
Loguercio AD; Alessandra R; Mazzocco KC; Dias AL; Busato AL; Singer Jda M; Rosa P
J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 12236642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations.
Wibowo G; Stockton L
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11572297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of current-generation bonding systems on microleakage of resin composite restorations.
Yazici AR; Başeren M; Dayangaç B
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):763-9. PubMed ID: 12553620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
Rodrigues Junior SA; Pin LF; Machado G; Della Bona A; Demarco FF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
Piemjai M; Miyasaka K; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques.
Beznos C
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 11203779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: an in vitro study.
Joseph A; Santhosh L; Hegde J; Panchajanya S; George R
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):148. PubMed ID: 23852255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Microleakage of a packable composite associated with different materials.
Loguercio AD; Bauer JR; Reis A; Rodrigues Filho LE; Busato AL
J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 11887513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An In-VitroEvaluation of Microleakage at the Cervical Margin Between two Different Class II Restorative Techniques Using Dye Penetration Method.
Jawaed NU; Abidi SY; Qazi FU; Ahmed S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Sep; 26(9):748-52. PubMed ID: 27671178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
Cal E; Celik EU; Turkun M
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
