450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17380803)
1. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation.
Stappert CF; Ozden U; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16046967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Partial coverage restoration systems on molars--comparison of failure load after exposure to a mastication simulator.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 33(9):698-705. PubMed ID: 16922744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. All-ceramic partial coverage premolar restorations. Cavity preparation design, reliability and fracture resistance after fatigue.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 16296437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations.
Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
Geminiani A; Lee H; Feng C; Ercoli C
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 20416410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Masticatory fatigue, fracture resistance, and marginal discrepancy of ceramic partial crowns with and without coverage of compromised cusps.
Stappert CF; Abe P; Kurths V; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Feb; 10(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 18389735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of bond quality on failure load of leucite- and lithia disilicate-based ceramics.
Clelland NL; Ramirez A; Katsube N; Seghi RR
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17280887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal adaptation of different types of all-ceramic partial coverage restorations after exposure to an artificial mouth.
Stappert CF; Denner N; Gerds T; Strub JR
Br Dent J; 2005 Dec; 199(12):779-83; discussion 777. PubMed ID: 16395369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of resin cements and aging on the fracture resistance of IPS e.max press posterior crowns.
Abou-Madina MM; Özcan M; Abdelaziz KM
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 22259793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations.
Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
