BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17381894)

  • 1. Bone-anchored hearing aid modified with directional microphone: do patients benefit?
    Blackmore KJ; Kernohan MD; Davison T; Johnson IJ
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Sep; 121(9):822-5. PubMed ID: 17381894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bilateral Bone-anchored Hearing Aid: impact on quality of life measured with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory.
    Ho EC; Monksfield P; Egan E; Reid A; Proops D
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):891-6. PubMed ID: 19692937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The bone-anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness: experience with 58 patients.
    Martin TP; Lowther R; Cooper H; Holder RL; Irving RM; Reid AP; Proops DW
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 35(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 20738337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid with different auditory profiles: objective and subjective measures.
    van Wieringen A; De Voecht K; Bosman AJ; Wouters J
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 36(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 21414178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient satisfaction with bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids: the Birmingham experience.
    Dutt SN; McDermott AL; Burrell SP; Cooper HR; Reid AP; Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 2002; (28):37-46. PubMed ID: 12138790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient quality of life with bone-anchored hearing aid: 10-year experience in Glasgow, Scotland.
    Mace AT; Isa A; Cooke LD
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Sep; 123(9):964-8. PubMed ID: 19454136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone anchored hearing aids for single-sided deafness.
    Baguley DM; Plydoropulou V; Prevost AT
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 34(2):176-7. PubMed ID: 19413631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone-anchored hearing aid subjective benefit for unilateral deafness.
    House JW; Kutz JW; Chung J; Fisher LM
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Mar; 120(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 20131363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II--field tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 19773657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results.
    Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone-anchored hearing implants in single-sided deafness patients: Long-term use and satisfaction by gender.
    Faber HT; Nelissen RC; Kramer SE; Cremers CW; Snik AF; Hol MK
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Dec; 125(12):2790-5. PubMed ID: 26152833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contralateral routing of signal hearing aid versus transcutaneous bone conduction in single-sided deafness.
    Leterme G; Bernardeschi D; Bensemman A; Coudert C; Portal JJ; Ferrary E; Sterkers O; Vicaut E; Frachet B; Bozorg Grayeli A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 26021779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone-anchored hearing devices in children with unilateral conductive hearing loss: a patient-carer perspective.
    Banga R; Doshi J; Child A; Pendleton E; Reid A; McDermott AL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2013 Sep; 122(9):582-7. PubMed ID: 24224402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone anchored hearing aid in single sided deafness: outcome in right-handed patients.
    Saliba I; Nader ME; El Fata F; Leroux T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2011 Oct; 38(5):570-6. PubMed ID: 21316882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.