145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17382100)
21. Analysis of consent validity for invasive, nondiagnostic research procedures.
Kimmelman J; Lemmens T; Kim SY
IRB; 2012; 34(5):1-7. PubMed ID: 23072039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The "greater good"...at what cost?: how nontherapeutic scientific studies can now create viable negligence claims in Maryland after Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
Gray CR
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 2002; 32(1):73-95. PubMed ID: 15233132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The use of Zairian children in HIV vaccine experimentation: a cross-cultural study in medical ethics.
Nairn TA
Annu Soc Christ Ethics; 1993; ():223-43. PubMed ID: 12568073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Child assent revisited.
Ladd RE
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):37-8. PubMed ID: 14744329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Nontherapeutic research, minimal risk, and the Kennedy Krieger lead abatement study.
Nelson RM
IRB; 2001; 23(6):7-11. PubMed ID: 12737175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Protecting the rights of pediatric research subjects in the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use.
Ryan AE
Fordham Int Law J; 2000 Mar; 23(3):848-934. PubMed ID: 16523592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Cold war at Porton Down: informed consent in Britain's biological and chemical warfare experiments.
Schmidt U
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2006; 15(4):366-80. PubMed ID: 17066763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Conducting research that involves subjects at the end of life who are unable to give consent.
Karlawish JH
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2003 Apr; 25(4):S14-24. PubMed ID: 12691693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Consent of a minor patient for experimental intervention].
Gałeska-Sliwka A; Sliwka K
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2008; 58(4):194-6. PubMed ID: 19441691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Justifying pediatric research not expected to benefit child subjects.
Spriggs M
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 22220961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Non-beneficial pediatric research and the best interests standard: a legal and ethical reconciliation.
Litton P
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2008; 8(2):359-420. PubMed ID: 19049018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Consent to pediatric research: a couple of distinctions.
Petrini C
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 22220958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Pediatric research: what is broken and what needs to be fixed?
Lantos JD
J Pediatr; 2004 Feb; 144(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 14760250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Biospecimens, Research Consent, and Distinguishing Cell Line Research.
Spector-Bagdady K; Fernandez Lynch H; Brenner JC; Shuman AG
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Mar; 5(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 30703213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Twenty-five years of therapeutic misconception.
Miller FG
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(2):6; author reply 6-7. PubMed ID: 18457218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Commentary on the Kennedy Krieger Institute Lead Paint Repair and Maintenance Study.
Pinder L
Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2002; 24(4):477-9. PubMed ID: 12127892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A more persuasive justification for pediatric research.
Litton P
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 22220962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Intention, autonomy, and brain events.
Gillett G
Bioethics; 2009 Jul; 23(6):330-9. PubMed ID: 19527261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. On Wendler's new justification for pediatric research.
Wachbroit R
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 22220960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. On justifying pediatric research without the prospect of clinical benefit.
Kopelman LM
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 22220956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
