These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1738222)

  • 1. Equal aspiration rates from postpylorus and intragastric-placed small-bore nasoenteric feeding tubes: a randomized, prospective study.
    Strong RM; Condon SC; Solinger MR; Namihas BN; Ito-Wong LA; Leuty JE
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1992; 16(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1738222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postpyloric enteral feeding costs for patients with severe head injury: blind placement, endoscopy, and PEG/J versus TPN.
    Ott L; Annis K; Hatton J; McClain M; Young B
    J Neurotrauma; 1999 Mar; 16(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 10195471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glucose content of tracheal aspirates: implications for the detection of tube feeding aspiration.
    Kinsey GC; Murray MJ; Swensen SJ; Miles JM
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Oct; 22(10):1557-62. PubMed ID: 7924365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nutritional outcome and pneumonia in critical care patients randomized to gastric versus jejunal tube feedings. The Critical Care Research Team.
    Montecalvo MA; Steger KA; Farber HW; Smith BF; Dennis RC; Fitzpatrick GF; Pollack SD; Korsberg TZ; Birkett DH; Hirsch EF
    Crit Care Med; 1992 Oct; 20(10):1377-87. PubMed ID: 1395657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do weighted nasoenteric feeding tubes facilitate duodenal intubations?
    Levenson R; Turner WW; Dyson A; Zike L; Reisch J
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1988; 12(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 3129589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Equal aspiration rates in gastrically and transpylorically fed critically ill patients.
    Esparza J; Boivin MA; Hartshorne MF; Levy H
    Intensive Care Med; 2001 Apr; 27(4):660-4. PubMed ID: 11398691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes using external magnetic guidance.
    Gabriel SA; Ackermann RJ
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2004; 28(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 15080607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clip-assisted endoscopic method for placement of a nasoenteric feeding tube into the distal duodenum.
    Shie CB; Hsu PI; Lo GH; Lin CK; Lo CC; Cheng JS; Lin CP; Chen WC; Wang EM; Chen IS; Mok KT; Lai KH
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2003 Jul; 102(7):514-6. PubMed ID: 14517593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Small bowel feeding tube placement using an electromagnetic tube placement device: accuracy of tip location.
    Rivera R; Campana J; Hamilton C; Lopez R; Seidner D
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2011 Sep; 35(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 21844241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic placement of nasoenteric feeding tubes in critically ill patients: a reliable alternative.
    Napolitano LM; Wagle M; Heard SO
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 1998 Dec; 8(6):395-400. PubMed ID: 9916592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence of pulmonary aspiration in intubated patients receiving enteral nutrition through wide- and narrow-bore nasogastric feeding tubes.
    Sands JA
    Heart Lung; 1991 Jan; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 1899085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of nasogastric tube in preventing aspiration pneumonia in patients with dysphagia.
    Mamun K; Lim J
    Singapore Med J; 2005 Nov; 46(11):627-31. PubMed ID: 16228094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multicenter, prospective study of the placement of transpyloric feeding tubes with assistance of a magnetic device. The Magnet-Guided Enteral Feeding Tube Study Group.
    Boivin M; Levy H; Hayes J
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2000; 24(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 11011786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A prospective randomized study of the usefulness of weighted versus unweighted feeding tubes. A comparison of the transpyloric passage capacity, duration time and the signs of intolerance for enteral nutrition].
    Jiménez C; González-Huix F; Auger E; Bou R; Pons N; Vila N; Figa M; Acero D
    Nutr Hosp; 1993 Apr; 8(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 8471654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aspiration after percutaneous gastrostomy. Assessment by Tc-99m labeling of the enteral feed.
    Cole MJ; Smith JT; Molnar C; Shaffer EA
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 1987 Feb; 9(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 3104444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bronchopulmonary complications associated to enteral nutrition devices in patients admitted to internal medicine departments.
    Marco J; Barba R; Lázaro M; Matía P; Plaza S; Canora J; Zapatero A
    Rev Clin Esp (Barc); 2013; 213(5):223-8. PubMed ID: 23566479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nasoenteric feeding tubes. Radiographic detection of complications.
    Ghahremani GG; Gould RJ
    Dig Dis Sci; 1986 Jun; 31(6):574-85. PubMed ID: 3086062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simplify the technique of nasoenteric feeding tube placement with a modified suture tie.
    Chang WK; McClave SA; Chao YC
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Jan; 39(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 15599210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Erythromycin as a prokinetic agent: a prospective, randomized, controlled study of efficacy in nasoenteric tube placement.
    Stern MA; Wolf DC
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1994 Nov; 89(11):2011-3. PubMed ID: 7942728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between feeding tube site and respiratory outcomes.
    Metheny NA; Stewart BJ; McClave SA
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2011 May; 35(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 21527596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.