331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17382606)
21. Phosphorylation of Rad55 on serines 2, 8, and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks.
Herzberg K; Bashkirov VI; Rolfsmeier M; Haghnazari E; McDonald WH; Anderson S; Bashkirova EV; Yates JR; Heyer WD
Mol Cell Biol; 2006 Nov; 26(22):8396-409. PubMed ID: 16966380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Advances in understanding DNA processing and protection at stalled replication forks.
Rickman K; Smogorzewska A
J Cell Biol; 2019 Apr; 218(4):1096-1107. PubMed ID: 30670471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Signaling pathways of replication stress in yeast.
Pardo B; Crabbé L; Pasero P
FEMS Yeast Res; 2017 Mar; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 27915243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Removal of RTF2 from Stalled Replisomes Promotes Maintenance of Genome Integrity.
Kottemann MC; Conti BA; Lach FP; Smogorzewska A
Mol Cell; 2018 Jan; 69(1):24-35.e5. PubMed ID: 29290612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Checkpoint responses to replication stalling: inducing tolerance and preventing mutagenesis.
Kai M; Wang TS
Mutat Res; 2003 Nov; 532(1-2):59-73. PubMed ID: 14643429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair.
Friedel AM; Pike BL; Gasser SM
Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 19230642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Nucleolytic processing of aberrant replication intermediates by an Exo1-Dna2-Sae2 axis counteracts fork collapse-driven chromosome instability.
Colosio A; Frattini C; Pellicanò G; Villa-Hernández S; Bermejo R
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Dec; 44(22):10676-10690. PubMed ID: 27672038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.
Tourrière H; Pasero P
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):900-13. PubMed ID: 17379579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Molecular anatomy of the DNA damage and replication checkpoints.
Qin J; Li L
Radiat Res; 2003 Feb; 159(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 12537518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The DNA damage response during DNA replication.
Branzei D; Foiani M
Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2005 Dec; 17(6):568-75. PubMed ID: 16226452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. DDK Has a Primary Role in Processing Stalled Replication Forks to Initiate Downstream Checkpoint Signaling.
Sasi NK; Coquel F; Lin YL; MacKeigan JP; Pasero P; Weinreich M
Neoplasia; 2018 Oct; 20(10):985-995. PubMed ID: 30157471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response.
Jones RM; Petermann E
Biochem J; 2012 Apr; 443(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22417748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Replication protein A and the Mre11.Rad50.Nbs1 complex co-localize and interact at sites of stalled replication forks.
Robison JG; Elliott J; Dixon K; Oakley GG
J Biol Chem; 2004 Aug; 279(33):34802-10. PubMed ID: 15180989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork.
Branzei D; Foiani M
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2010 Mar; 11(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 20177396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A DNA replication fork-centric view of the budding yeast DNA damage response.
McClure AW; Canal B; Diffley JFX
DNA Repair (Amst); 2022 Nov; 119():103393. PubMed ID: 36108423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. TopBP1 and DNA polymerase alpha-mediated recruitment of the 9-1-1 complex to stalled replication forks: implications for a replication restart-based mechanism for ATR checkpoint activation.
Yan S; Michael WM
Cell Cycle; 2009 Sep; 8(18):2877-84. PubMed ID: 19652550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rad53 regulates replication fork restart after DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Szyjka SJ; Aparicio JG; Viggiani CJ; Knott S; Xu W; Tavaré S; Aparicio OM
Genes Dev; 2008 Jul; 22(14):1906-20. PubMed ID: 18628397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.
Patel DR; Weiss RS
Biochem Soc Trans; 2018 Dec; 46(6):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 30514768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Replication stress induces specific enrichment of RECQ1 at common fragile sites FRA3B and FRA16D.
Lu X; Parvathaneni S; Hara T; Lal A; Sharma S
Mol Cancer; 2013 Apr; 12(1):29. PubMed ID: 23601052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. DNA-PKcs and PARP1 Bind to Unresected Stalled DNA Replication Forks Where They Recruit XRCC1 to Mediate Repair.
Ying S; Chen Z; Medhurst AL; Neal JA; Bao Z; Mortusewicz O; McGouran J; Song X; Shen H; Hamdy FC; Kessler BM; Meek K; Helleday T
Cancer Res; 2016 Mar; 76(5):1078-88. PubMed ID: 26603896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
