BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

583 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17383067)

  • 1. The effectiveness of different polymerization protocols for class II composite resin restorations.
    de Jong LC; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JJ; Wolke JG; Geitenbeek B
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 17383067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimal exposure time of different LED-curing devices.
    Schattenberg A; Lichtenberg D; Stender E; Willershausen B; Ernst CP
    Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1043-9. PubMed ID: 18241913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units.
    Ramp LC; Broome JC; Ramp MH
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16555655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of pre-heating on depth of cure and surface hardness of light-polymerized resin composites.
    Muñoz CA; Bond PR; Sy-Muñoz J; Tan D; Peterson J
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 18795516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cure width potential for MOD resin composite molar restorations.
    Palin WM; Senyilmaz DP; Marquis PM; Shortall AC
    Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1083-94. PubMed ID: 18304625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Hunecke A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay.
    Park SH; Kim SS; Cho YS; Lee CK; Noh BD
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Curing capability of halogen and LED light curing units in deep class II cavities in extracted human molars.
    Hasler C; Zimmerli B; Lussi A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):354-63. PubMed ID: 16802644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of LED curing modes on cusp deflection and hardness of composite restorations.
    Alomari QD; Mansour YF
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):684-9. PubMed ID: 16382590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guidance of shrinkage vectors vs irradiation at reduced intensity for improving marginal seal of class V resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Hiltl O; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12216571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of new LED light-curing units in hardening of Class II composite restorations.
    El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Wasef M; Omar H; Kermanshahi S
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2007 Apr; 73(3):253. PubMed ID: 17439711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Curing light intensity effects on wear resistance of two resin composites.
    St-Georges AJ; Swift EJ; Thompson JY; Heymann HO
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12120780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Composite resin microhardness: the influence of light curing method, composite shade, and depth of cure.
    de Araújo CS; Schein MT; Zanchi CH; Rodrigues SA; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 18473026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study.
    El-Shamy H; Saber MH; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 22313267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Curing efficiency of three different curing lights at different distances for a hybrid composite.
    Zhu S; Platt JA
    Am J Dent; 2009 Dec; 22(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 20178217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of curing methods and materials on the marginal seal of class V composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Siebrecht C; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 12670072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of different exposure time required to stabilize hardness values of composite resin restorations.
    Cavalcante LM; Valentino TA; Carlini B; Silikas N; Pimenta LA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):42-50. PubMed ID: 19279971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between ceramics translucency and polymerization efficiency through ceramics.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):908-14. PubMed ID: 18093641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of a LED versus halogen light cure polymerization on the curing characteristics of three composite resins.
    Besnault C; Pradelle-Plasse N; Picard B; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 14677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.