These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17383116)

  • 1. Effects of methamphetamine on response rate: a microstructural analysis.
    Bennett JA; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 17383116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying the molecular structure of behavior: separate effects of caffeine, cocaine, and adenosine agonists on interresponse times and lever-press durations.
    Newland MC
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Feb; 8(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 9832996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
    Pitts RC; Febbo SM
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of drugs on response duration differentiation. VI: differential effects under differential reinforcement of low rates of responding schedules.
    McClure GY; McMillan DE
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1997 Jun; 281(3):1368-80. PubMed ID: 9190873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of amphetamine on differential reinforcement of low rates of responding.
    Saulsgiver KA; McClure EA; Wynne CD
    Behav Pharmacol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 17351419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19429218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. L-methamphetamine and selective MAO inhibitors decrease morphine-reinforced and non-reinforced behavior in rats; Insights towards selegiline's mechanism of action.
    He S; Grasing K
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2006 Dec; 85(4):675-88. PubMed ID: 17157368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Separating the effects of response rate and reinforcement frequency in the rate-dependent effects of amphetamine and scopolamine on the schedule-controlled performance of rats and pigeons.
    MacPhail RC; Gollub LR
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1975 Aug; 194(2):332-42. PubMed ID: 1151762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of methamphetamine and scopolamine on variability of response location.
    Moerschbaecher JM; Thompson DM; Thomas JR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Sep; 32(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 115956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of d-amphetamine on the behavior of pigeons exposed to the peak procedure.
    Saulsgiver KA; McClure EA; Wynne CD
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):268-85. PubMed ID: 16413140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alterations in DRH and DRL performance in rats developmentally exposed to an environmental PCB mixture.
    Sable HJ; Powers BE; Wang VC; Widholm JJ; Schantz SL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2006; 28(5):548-56. PubMed ID: 16930942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The discrimination of drug mixtures using a four-choice procedure in pigeons.
    McMillan DE; Li M
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Nov; 164(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 12404084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of d-amphetamine on behavior maintained by signaled and unsignaled delays to reinforcement.
    Thomas LD; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 19429220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of drugs on response duration differentiation. V: differential effects under temporal response differentiation schedules.
    McClure GY; Wenger GR; McMillan DE
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1997 Jun; 281(3):1357-67. PubMed ID: 9190872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent performance as bouts of behavior.
    Smith TT; McLean AP; Shull RL; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jul; 102(1):102-25. PubMed ID: 24861997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Baseline training history and effects of methamphetamine on performance of pigeons on an interval-bisection task.
    Johnson RN; Ward RD; Odum AL
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):484-9. PubMed ID: 20170715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Black agouti (ACI) rats show greater drug- and cue-induced reinstatement of methamphetamine-seeking behavior than Fischer 344 and Lewis rats.
    Xi J; Kruzich PJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2007 May; 87(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 17481706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of drugs of abuse and signal predictability in two models of sustained attention in pigeons.
    Lemmonds CA; Wenger GR
    Behav Pharmacol; 2003 Jul; 14(4):279-94. PubMed ID: 12838034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential resurgence and response elimination.
    Doughty AH; da Silva SP; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 17395402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concurrent access to sucrose pellets decreases methamphetamine-seeking behavior in Lewis rats.
    Ping A; Kruzich PJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2008 Sep; 90(3):492-6. PubMed ID: 18495228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.