225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17383925)
1. A complete finite element model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations.
Daas M; Dubois G; Bonnet AS; Lipinski P; Rignon-Bret C
Med Eng Phys; 2008 Mar; 30(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 17383925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical study of mandible bone supporting a four-implant retained bridge: finite element analysis of the influence of bone anisotropy and foodstuff position.
Bonnet AS; Postaire M; Lipinski P
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Sep; 31(7):806-15. PubMed ID: 19395303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture: effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution.
Assunção WG; Barão VA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 19076244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture.
Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 15610541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.
Cruz M; Lourenço AF; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; de Castro Lemonge AC; Wassall T
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):421-38. PubMed ID: 17065763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
