These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1738535)

  • 1. Court-ordered treatment in obstetrics: the ethical views and legal framework.
    Holcomb WL; Appleton SF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 79(3):477-8; author reply 478-9. PubMed ID: 1738535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Court-ordered treatment in obstetrics: the ethical views and legal framework.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 79(3):476-7; author reply 478-9. PubMed ID: 1738534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Court-ordered treatment in obstetrics: the ethical views and legal framework.
    Strong C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):861-8. PubMed ID: 1923212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forced cesareans: the most unkindest cut of all.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):16-7, 45. PubMed ID: 7107234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Court-ordered surgery for the protection of a viable fetus: Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority, 247 Ga. 86, 274 S.E.2d 457 (1981).
    Manner RL
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1982; 5(1):125-48. PubMed ID: 11649638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical issues in obstetrics.
    Samsioe G; Abreg A
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1996; 41(3):284-7. PubMed ID: 8799757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical and legal considerations of antenatal diagnosis.
    Sarto GE
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Apr; 7(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 7379428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
    Crepps J; Miller A
    Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal duties during pregnancy: toward a conceptual framework.
    Sterns ML
    New Engl Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(3):595-634. PubMed ID: 16998992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion ethics.
    Fromer MJ
    Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making.
    Stanyer BT
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic implications and medical-legal dilemmas of maternal versus fetal rights.
    Mohaupt SM; Sharma KK
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):985-92. PubMed ID: 9729816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal versus maternal rights: medical and legal perspectives.
    Bowes WA; Selgestad B
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Aug; 58(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 7254733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Terminal care and the pregnant woman: ethical reflections on In Re: A.C.
    Tuohey JF
    Pediatrics; 1991 Dec; 88(6):1268-73. PubMed ID: 1956747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The maternal-fetal rights dilemma: honoring a woman's choice of medical care during pregnancy.
    Arch RR
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):637-73. PubMed ID: 8666737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
    Rush SE
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
    Parness JA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Illinois hospital given temporary custody of fetus.
    Am Med News; 1982 Feb; 25(7):11. PubMed ID: 11645468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comment: wrongful conception and the right not to be harmed.
    Feinberg J
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):57-77. PubMed ID: 11655782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Respecting liberty and preventing harm: limits of state intervention in prenatal choice.
    Mathieu D
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 11655781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.