163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17385583)
1. The effect of adhesive dressing edges on cutaneous irritancy and skin barrier function.
Dykes PJ
J Wound Care; 2007 Mar; 16(3):97-100. PubMed ID: 17385583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives.
Waring M; Bielfeldt S; Mätzold K; Wilhelm KP; Butcher M
J Wound Care; 2011 Sep; 20(9):412, 414, 416-22. PubMed ID: 22068140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The link between the peel force of adhesive dressings and subjective discomfort in volunteer subjects.
Dykes PJ; Heggie R
J Wound Care; 2003 Jul; 12(7):260-2. PubMed ID: 12894697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of adhesive dressings on the stratum corneum of the skin.
Dykes PJ; Heggie R; Hill SA
J Wound Care; 2001 Feb; 10(2):7-10. PubMed ID: 12964220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison among several foam dressings in the properties of water-absorption, water-locking and air permeability].
Ge TC; Xing N; Chen J; Zhou JJ; Su GL; Shi JW; Zheng YS
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 28(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 23290760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis.
Yan-yu W; Xue-min W; Yi-Mei T; Ying C; Na L
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 30(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 21774626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Allevyn Adhesive and Biatain Adhesive in the management of pressure ulcers.
Amione P; Ricci E; Topo F; Izzo L; Pirovano R; Rega V; Cocci C; Masina M
J Wound Care; 2005 Sep; 14(8):365-70. PubMed ID: 16178291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of a measure of acute irritation to predict the outcome of repeated usage of hand soap products.
Williams C; Wilkinson M; McShane P; Pennington D; Fernandez C; Pierce S
Br J Dermatol; 2011 Jun; 164(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 21332456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biophysical effects of repetitive removal of adhesive dressings on peri-ulcer skin.
Zillmer R; Agren MS; Gottrup F; Karlsmark T
J Wound Care; 2006 May; 15(5):187-91. PubMed ID: 16711170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the pressure-reducing effect of wound dressings.
Matsuzaki K; Kishi K
J Wound Care; 2015 Nov; 24(11):512, 514-7. PubMed ID: 26551643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin changes induced by a zinc oxide dressing compared with a hydrocolloid dressing in healthy individuals.
Nielsen LF; Blume N; Romme T; Samuelsen P; Everland H; Ifversen P; Karlsmark T
Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 15807813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in-vitro study of the pressure-relieving properties of four wound dressings for foot ulcers.
Ashford RL; Freear ND; Shippen JM
J Wound Care; 2001 Feb; 10(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 12964226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of ultrasound to characterise the fluid-handling characteristics of four foam dressings.
Young S; Bielby A; Milne J
J Wound Care; 2007 Nov; 16(10):425-8, 430-1. PubMed ID: 18065018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 15059174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the value of silicone and hydrocolloid products in stoma care.
Berry J; Black P; Smith R; Stuchfield B
Br J Nurs; 2007 Jul 12-25; 16(13):778, 780, 782 passim. PubMed ID: 17851331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of occlusive and unocclusive exposure to xylene and benzene on skin irritation and molecular responses in hairless rats.
Chatterjee A; Babu RJ; Ahaghotu E; Singh M
Arch Toxicol; 2005 May; 79(5):294-301. PubMed ID: 15902427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in skin barrier function following long-term treatment with moisturizers, a randomized controlled trial.
Buraczewska I; Berne B; Lindberg M; Törmä H; Lodén M
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Mar; 156(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 17300239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
