These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17385638)
1. Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy device based on spiking neurons architecture and reinforcement learning scheme. Rom R; Erel J; Glikson M; Lieberman RA; Rosenblum K; Binah O; Ginosar R; Hayes DL IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2007 Mar; 18(2):542-50. PubMed ID: 17385638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy device: a simulation report. Rom R; Erel J; Glikson M; Rosenblum K; Ginosar R; Hayes DL Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Nov; 28(11):1168-73. PubMed ID: 16359282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation study of an analog spiking neural network for assisting cardiac delay prediction in a cardiac resynchronization therapy device. Sun Q; Schwartz F; Michel J; Herve Y; Dalmolin R IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2011 Jun; 22(6):858-69. PubMed ID: 21536521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of device programming for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Burri H; Sunthorn H; Shah D; Lerch R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Dec; 29(12):1416-25. PubMed ID: 17201852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Role of Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Cobb DB; Gold MR Card Electrophysiol Clin; 2015 Dec; 7(4):765-79. PubMed ID: 26596818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiac resynchronization therapy beyond nominal settings: who needs individual programming of the atrioventricular and interventricular delay? Bogaard MD; Meine M; Tuinenburg AE; Maskara B; Loh P; Doevendans PA Europace; 2012 Dec; 14(12):1746-53. PubMed ID: 22753868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of acoustic cardiography and echocardiography for optimizing pacemaker settings in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Zuber M; Toggweiler S; Quinn-Tate L; Brown L; Amkieh A; Erne P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jul; 31(7):802-11. PubMed ID: 18684276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective comparison of AV delay programming methods for hemodynamic optimization during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Gold MR; Niazi I; Giudici M; Leman RB; Sturdivant JL; Kim MH; Yu Y; Ding J; Waggoner AD J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 May; 18(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 17313533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance evaluation of a right atrial automatic capture verification algorithm using two different sensing configurations. Sperzel J; Goetze S; Kennergren C; Biffi M; Brooke MJ; Vireca E; Saha S; Schubert B; Butter C Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 May; 32(5):579-87. PubMed ID: 19422578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The optimized V-V interval determined by interventricular conduction times versus invasive measurement by LVdP/dtMAX. van Gelder BM; Meijer A; Bracke FA J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2008 Sep; 19(9):939-44. PubMed ID: 18399968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whether noninvasive optimization of AV and VV delays improves the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Urbanek B; Chudzik M; Klimczak A; Rosiak M; Lewek J; Wranicz JK Cardiol J; 2013; 20(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 23913460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous electrical and mechanical mapping using 3D cardiac mapping system: novel approach for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy. Ryu K; D'Avila A; Heist EK; Rosenberg SP; Chou J; Yang M; Singh JP J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):219-22. PubMed ID: 20021519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Right ventricular contractility as a measure of optimal interventricular pacing setting in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Sciaraffia E; Malmborg H; Lönnerholm S; Blomström P; Blomström Lundqvist C Europace; 2009 Nov; 11(11):1496-500. PubMed ID: 19812048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atrioventricular delay programming in cardiac resynchronization therapy devices: fixed or adaptive? A randomized monocenter trial. Schueler M; Voss F; Bauer A; Thomas D; Kelemen K; Katus HA; Becker R J Electrocardiol; 2012; 45(6):783-6. PubMed ID: 22727475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of dyssynchrony parameters for VV-optimization in CRT patients. Risum N; Sogaard P; Hansen TF; Bruun NE; Hoffmann S; Kisslo J; Jons C; Olsen NT Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Nov; 36(11):1382-90. PubMed ID: 23827016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anodal capture in cardiac resynchronization therapy implications for device programming. Tamborero D; Mont L; Alanis R; Berruezo A; Tolosana JM; Sitges M; Vidal B; Brugada J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Sep; 29(9):940-5. PubMed ID: 16981916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrocardiographic optimization of interventricular delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a simple method to optimize the device. Vidal B; Tamborero D; Mont L; Sitges M; Delgado V; Berruezo A; Díaz-Infante E; Tolosana JM; Paré C; Brugada J J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Dec; 18(12):1252-7. PubMed ID: 17916140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Programmed versus effective VV delay during CRT optimization: when what you see is not what you get. Bogaard MD; Meine M; Doevendans PA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 36(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 23305237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal atrioventricular delay in CRT patients can be approximated using surface electrocardiography and device electrograms. Jones RC; Svinarich T; Rubin A; Levin V; Phang R; Murillo J; Sambelashvili A J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1226-32. PubMed ID: 20522154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]