725 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17386062)
1. Matched pair analysis of ureteroscopy vs. shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper ureteric calculi.
Stewart GD; Bariol SV; Moussa SA; Smith G; Tolley DA
Int J Clin Pract; 2007 May; 61(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 17386062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.
Salem HK
Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.
Lindqvist K; Holmberg G; Peeker R; Grenabo L
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 16608808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ureteric stents compromise stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones: results of a matched-pair analysis.
Argyropoulos AN; Tolley DA
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 18710453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China.
Zhang J; Shi Q; Wang GZ; Wang F; Jiang N
Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21597268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.
Hautmann S; Friedrich MG; Fernandez S; Steuber T; Hammerer P; Braun PM; Jünemann KP; Huland H
Urol Int; 2004; 73(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 15539843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized comparison between shockwave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones <2 cm: a single center experience.
Kumar A; Nanda B; Kumar N; Kumar R; Vasudeva P; Mohanty NK
J Endourol; 2015 Jan; 29(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23914770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrograde ureteroscopy for distal ureteric stone removal in children.
De Dominicis M; Matarazzo E; Capozza N; Collura G; Caione P
BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):1049-52. PubMed ID: 15839930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy under intravenous sedation for the management of distal ureteric calculi.
Hosking DH; Smith WE; McColm SE
Can J Urol; 2003 Apr; 10(2):1780-4. PubMed ID: 12773226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Treatment of ureteral calculi: report of 152 calculi].
Lamotte F; Izadifar V; Fontaine E; Barthélémy Y; Beurton D
Prog Urol; 2000 Feb; 10(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 10785914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.
Pearle MS; Lingeman JE; Leveillee R; Kuo R; Preminger GM; Nadler RB; Macaluso J; Monga M; Kumar U; Dushinski J; Albala DM; Wolf JS; Assimos D; Fabrizio M; Munch LC; Nakada SY; Auge B; Honey J; Ogan K; Pattaras J; McDougall EM; Averch TD; Turk T; Pietrow P; Watkins S
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5 Suppl):S69-73. PubMed ID: 18405758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteric lithiasis. Analysis of 354 urs procedures in a community hospital.
du Fossé W; Billiet I; Mattelaer J
Acta Urol Belg; 1998 Oct; 66(3):33-40. PubMed ID: 9864877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteric calculi: a cost-effectiveness study.
Izamin I; Aniza I; Rizal AM; Aljunid SM
Med J Malaysia; 2009 Mar; 64(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19852314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the holmium:YAG laser for ureterolithotripsy in children.
Dogan HS; Tekgul S; Akdogan B; Keskin MS; Sahin A
BJU Int; 2004 Jul; 94(1):131-3. PubMed ID: 15217447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geraghty RM; Jones P; Herrmann TRW; Aboumarzouk O; Somani BK
World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1783-1793. PubMed ID: 29730839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
