250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17386991)
1. Detectability of lung nodules using flat panel detector with dual energy subtraction by two shot method: evaluation by ROC method.
Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Yoshimoto M; Mochizuki T; Murase K
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 17386991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Uemura M; Miyagawa M; Yasuhara Y; Murakami T; Ikura H; Sakamoto K; Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Mochizuki T
Radiat Med; 2005 Sep; 23(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 16389980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: efficacy of dual-energy subtraction technique using flat-panel detector chest radiography.
Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Nakaura T; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nomori H; Yamashita Y
Clin Radiol; 2010 Aug; 65(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 20599062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of dual-energy subtraction and electronic bone suppression combined with computer-aided detection on chest radiographs: effect on human observers' performance in nodule detection.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Schick A; Cullmann JL; Ebner L; Megyeri B; Vock P; Christe A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1006-13. PubMed ID: 23617482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of lung cancer using single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Ide K; Mogami H; Murakami T; Yasuhara Y; Miyagawa M; Mochizuki T
Radiat Med; 2007 Jun; 25(5):195-201. PubMed ID: 17581707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis and dual-energy subtraction radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: initial evaluations in human clinical cases.
Gomi T; Nozaki M; Takeda T; Umeda T; Takahashi K; Nakajima M
Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1357-63. PubMed ID: 24119347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flat-panel detector computed tomography imaging: observer performance in detecting pulmonary nodules in comparison with conventional chest radiography and multidetector computed tomography.
Otani H; Nitta N; Ikeda M; Nagatani Y; Tanaka T; Kitahara H; Murakami Y; Takahashi M; Murata K
J Thorac Imaging; 2012 Jan; 27(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 21307781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm.
Kido S; Ikezoe J; Naito H; Arisawa J; Tamura S; Kozuka T; Ito W; Shimura K; Kato H
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):407-12. PubMed ID: 7824718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved detection of small lung cancers with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Li F; Engelmann R; Doi K; MacMahon H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):886-91. PubMed ID: 18356433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical evaluation of single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: with FCR 9501 ES].
Takashima T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Nov; 56(13):909-16. PubMed ID: 8969053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
Rapp-Bernhardt U; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Esseling R; Roehl FW; Schiborr M; Theobald-Hormann I; Heindel W
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Small lung cancers: improved detection by use of bone suppression imaging--comparison with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Li F; Engelmann R; Pesce LL; Doi K; Metz CE; Macmahon H
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):937-49. PubMed ID: 21946054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities.
Fischbach F; Freund T; Röttgen R; Engert U; Felix R; Ricke J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1519-24. PubMed ID: 14627567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs.
Kobayashi T; Xu XW; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K
Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):843-8. PubMed ID: 8638015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study.
Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Yamashita Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 28(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 20437132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual energy subtraction digital radiography improves performance of a next generation computer-aided detection program.
Balkman JD; Mehandru S; DuPont E; Novak RD; Gilkeson RC
J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 20160602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of calcification in pulmonary nodules using bone images obtained with single exposure energy subtraction].
Kobayashi T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Aug; 55(9):638-45. PubMed ID: 7478948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
