404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17388155)
1. Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in 3 T MR images.
Baldwin LN; Wachowicz K; Thomas SD; Rivest R; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):388-99. PubMed ID: 17388155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Continuous table acquisition MRI for radiotherapy treatment planning: distortion assessment with a new extended 3D volumetric phantom.
Walker A; Liney G; Holloway L; Dowling J; Rivest-Henault D; Metcalfe P
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1982-91. PubMed ID: 25832089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved volumetric measurement of brain structure with a distortion correction procedure using an ADNI phantom.
Maikusa N; Yamashita F; Tanaka K; Abe O; Kawaguchi A; Kabasawa H; Chiba S; Kasahara A; Kobayashi N; Yuasa T; Sato N; Matsuda H; Iwatsubo T;
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):062303. PubMed ID: 23718605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A complete distortion correction for MR images: I. Gradient warp correction.
Doran SJ; Charles-Edwards L; Reinsberg SA; Leach MO
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(7):1343-61. PubMed ID: 15798328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of 3D geometric distortion of magnetic resonance imaging scanners commissioned for radiation therapy planning.
Torfeh T; Hammoud R; Perkins G; McGarry M; Aouadi S; Celik A; Hwang KP; Stancanello J; Petric P; Al-Hammadi N
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 34(5):645-53. PubMed ID: 26795695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR-based field-of-view extension in MR/PET: B0 homogenization using gradient enhancement (HUGE).
Blumhagen JO; Ladebeck R; Fenchel M; Scheffler K
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Oct; 70(4):1047-57. PubMed ID: 23203976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. System-dependent image distortion related to gantry positions of a 0.35 T MRgRT: Characterization and the corresponding correction.
Marasini S; Quinn B; Cole M; Flores R; Kim T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 24(1):e13826. PubMed ID: 36354747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integration of spatial distortion effects in a 4D computational phantom for simulation studies in extra-cranial MRI-guided radiation therapy: Initial results.
Kroll C; Dietrich O; Bortfeldt J; Kamp F; Neppl S; Belka C; Parodi K; Baroni G; Paganelli C; Riboldi M
Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1646-1660. PubMed ID: 33220073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimizing magnetic resonance image geometric distortion at 7 Tesla for frameless presurgical planning using skin-adhered fiducials.
Kirby KM; Koons EK; Welker KM; Fagan AJ
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):694-701. PubMed ID: 36301228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Harmonic analysis for the characterization and correction of geometric distortion in MRI.
Tadic T; Jaffray DA; Stanescu T
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112303. PubMed ID: 25370659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correction of MR image distortions induced by metallic objects using a 3D cubic B-spline basis set: application to stereotactic surgical planning.
Skare S; Andersson JL
Magn Reson Med; 2005 Jul; 54(1):169-81. PubMed ID: 15968661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of geometric distortion in 0.2T MRI on radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer.
Petersch B; Bogner J; Fransson A; Lorang T; Pötter R
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Apr; 71(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 15066296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of tissue magnetic susceptibility-induced distortions for MRIgRT.
Stanescu T; Wachowicz K; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7185-93. PubMed ID: 23231269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring geometric accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging with 3D-printed phantom and nonrigid image registration.
Nousiainen K; Mäkelä T
MAGMA; 2020 Jun; 33(3):401-410. PubMed ID: 31646408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion-sensitized ophthalmic magnetic resonance imaging free of geometric distortion at 3.0 and 7.0 T: a feasibility study in healthy subjects and patients with intraocular masses.
Paul K; Graessl A; Rieger J; Lysiak D; Huelnhagen T; Winter L; Heidemann R; Lindner T; Hadlich S; Zimpfer A; Pohlmann A; Endemann B; Krüger PC; Langner S; Stachs O; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):309-21. PubMed ID: 25612144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving geometric accuracy in the presence of susceptibility difference artifacts produced by metallic implants in magnetic resonance imaging.
Pauchard Y; Smith MR; Mintchev MP
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1387-99. PubMed ID: 16229424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing.
Madabhushi A; Udupa JK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):561-76. PubMed ID: 15889544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Geometric distortion correction of high-resolution 3 T diffusion tensor brain images.
Ardekani S; Sinha U
Magn Reson Med; 2005 Nov; 54(5):1163-71. PubMed ID: 16187289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of device-specific 2D and 3D image distortion correction algorithms for magnetic resonance imaging of the head provided by a manufacturer.
Karger CP; Höss A; Bendl R; Canda V; Schad L
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):N253-61. PubMed ID: 16757858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of system-related geometric distortions in MR images employed in Gamma Knife radiosurgery applications.
Pappas EP; Seimenis I; Moutsatsos A; Georgiou E; Nomikos P; Karaiskos P
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(19):6993-7011. PubMed ID: 27648985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
