316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17388170)
1. Radiation attenuation by lead and nonlead materials used in radiation shielding garments.
McCaffrey JP; Shen H; Downton B; Mainegra-Hing E
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):530-7. PubMed ID: 17388170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects for interventional radiology (IR) physicians.
McCaffrey JP; Tessier F; Shen H
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4537-46. PubMed ID: 22830785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of using scatter-mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation-protective garments.
Jones AK; Pasciak AS; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 29314058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers.
McCaffrey JP; Mainegra-Hing E; Shen H
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5586-94. PubMed ID: 20095271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emission of fluorescent x-radiation from non-lead based shielding materials of protective clothing: a radiobiological problem?
Schmid E; Panzer W; Schlattl H; Eder H
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):N129-39. PubMed ID: 22809876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the (f)utility of measuring the lead equivalence of protective garments.
Jones AK; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063902. PubMed ID: 23718618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical Evaluation of Protective Garments with Respect to Garment Characteristics and Manufacturer Label Information.
Lichliter A; Weir V; Heithaus RE; Gipson S; Syed A; West J; Rees C
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 27789076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-62. PubMed ID: 25771561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation Protection Clothing in X-Ray Diagnostics - Influence of the Different Methods of Measurement on the Lead Equivalent and the Required Mass.
Schöpf T; Pichler T
Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):768-75. PubMed ID: 27248650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo simulation of the dose to nuclear medicine staff wearing protective garments.
Fog LS; Collins P
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Dec; 31(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 19239057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Monte Carlo study of the energy spectra and transmission characteristics of scattered radiation from x-ray computed tomography.
Platten DJ
J Radiol Prot; 2014 Jun; 34(2):445-56. PubMed ID: 24894101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of shielding materials in a Compton spectrometer applied to x-ray tube quality control using Monte Carlo simulation.
Gallardo S; Ródenas J; Verdú G; Villaescusa JI
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):375-9. PubMed ID: 16381749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lightweight Lead Aprons: The Emperor's New Clothes in the Angiography Suite?
Lu H; Boyd C; Dawson J
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 May; 57(5):730-739. PubMed ID: 31005510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shielding properties of lead-free protective clothing and their impact on radiation doses.
Schlattl H; Zankl M; Eder H; Hoeschen C
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4270-80. PubMed ID: 18072491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of conversion coefficients relating air-kerma to H*(10) using primary and transmitted x-ray spectra in the diagnostic radiology energy range.
Santos JC; Mariano L; Tomal A; Costa PR
J Radiol Prot; 2016 Mar; 36(1):117-32. PubMed ID: 26835613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. LEAD COMPOSITE VS. NONLEAD PROTECTIVE GARMENTS: WHICH ARE BETTER? A MULTIVENDOR COMPARISON.
Peters SMB; Zweers D; de Lange F; Mourik JEM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Aug; 175(4):460-465. PubMed ID: 28074020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of self-absorption on PET and PET/CT shielding requirements.
Elschot M; de Wit TC; de Jong HW
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2999-3007. PubMed ID: 20632612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. THE ABSORPTION PROPERTIES OF LEAD-FREE GARMENTS FOR USE IN RADIATION PROTECTION.
Çetin H; Yurt A; Yüksel SH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 173(4):345-350. PubMed ID: 26884505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
