These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17388192)

  • 1. Novel approach to evaluating breast density utilizing ultrasound tomography.
    Glide C; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):744-53. PubMed ID: 17388192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images.
    Glide-Hurst CK; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):3988-97. PubMed ID: 18841850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density.
    Glide-Hurst CK; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4491-8. PubMed ID: 18072514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.
    Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast density analysis in 3-D whole breast ultrasound images.
    Chang RF; Chang-Chien KC; Takada E; Suri JS; Moon WK; Wu JH; Cho N; Wang YF; Chen DR
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2795-8. PubMed ID: 17945741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast Density Analysis with Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound: Comparison with 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Chen JH; Lee YW; Chan SW; Yeh DC; Chang RF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1211-20. PubMed ID: 26831342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography: first results with the Computed Ultrasound Risk Evaluation (CURE) prototype.
    Duric N; Littrup P; Poulo L; Babkin A; Pevzner R; Holsapple E; Rama O; Glide C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):773-85. PubMed ID: 17388195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women using 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts.
    Giuliano V; Giuliano C
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 23116728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: technical assessment.
    Duric N; Littrup P; Babkin A; Chambers D; Azevedo S; Pevzner R; Tokarev M; Holsapple E; Rama O; Duncan R
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1375-86. PubMed ID: 15984689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation to aid breast cancer image interpretation.
    Gu P; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Yuan J; Wang X; Carson PL
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():51-8. PubMed ID: 26547117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
    Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intensity-Invariant Texture Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses.
    Lo CM; Moon WK; Huang CS; Chen JH; Yang MC; Chang RF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2039-48. PubMed ID: 25843514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results.
    Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography.
    Li C; Duric N; Littrup P; Huang L
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1615-28. PubMed ID: 19647920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized analysis of shadowing on breast ultrasound for improved lesion detection.
    Drukker K; Giger ML; Mendelson EB
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1833-42. PubMed ID: 12906202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
    Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adding Ultrasound to the Evaluation of Patients with Pathologic Nipple Discharge to Diagnose Additional Breast Cancers: Preliminary Data.
    Yoon H; Yoon JH; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Park BW; Kim MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):2099-107. PubMed ID: 25952162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.