These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17388681)

  • 1. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
    Kulstad E
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Training and experience of peer reviewers: is being a "good reviewer" a persistent quality?
    García-Doval I
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e144; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability.
    Green SM; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):149-152.e4. PubMed ID: 20947204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Politics and peer review.
    Magnus D
    Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 15035920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Open access under scrutiny.
    Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
    Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
    J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
    Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
    Bugiardini R
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Authors' financial interests should be made known to manuscript reviewers.
    de Melo-Martín I; Intemann K
    Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7150):129. PubMed ID: 17625543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The "peer-review" process in biomedical journals: characteristics of "Elite" reviewers].
    Alfonso F
    Neurologia; 2010; 25(9):521-9. PubMed ID: 21093700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New authors' guidelines for Palliative Medicine: more work for authors, reviewers and editors or an essential tool?
    Walshe C
    Palliat Med; 2010 Sep; 24(6):559-60. PubMed ID: 20837732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary.
    Allen LA; Ho PM
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29237748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceived journal quality: an indicator of research quality.
    Fahy K; Fenwick J
    Women Birth; 2008 Sep; 21(3):97-8. PubMed ID: 18657498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflicts of interest and disclosures in publications.
    Camilleri M; Dubnansky EC; Rustgi AK
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Mar; 5(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 17368225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
    Klein JS; Harmon SP;
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Lakartidningen's scrutiny routines--equal to the heavies. The peer review system and the expert editorial staff guarantee scientific quality].
    Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Bågedahl-Strindlund M; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Ostergren J
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Nov; 100(48):3934-6. PubMed ID: 14717088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.