277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17389293)
1. Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Chaudhry R; Scheitel SM; McMurtry EK; Leutink DJ; Cabanela RL; Naessens JM; Rahman AS; Davis LA; Stroebel RJ
Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 17389293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.
Barr JK; Franks AL; Lee NC; Antonucci DM; Rifkind S; Schachter M
Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep; 7(9):887-94. PubMed ID: 11570022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhancing compliance with screening mammography recommendations: a clinical trial in a primary care office.
Mohler PJ
Fam Med; 1995 Feb; 27(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7737444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Telephone reminders increase re-screening in a county breast screening program.
Goel A; George J; Burack RC
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2008 May; 19(2):512-21. PubMed ID: 18469422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving compliance with breast cancer screening in older women. Results of a randomized controlled trial.
Herman CJ; Speroff T; Cebul RD
Arch Intern Med; 1995 Apr; 155(7):717-22. PubMed ID: 7695460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized controlled trial of mammography intervention in insured very low-income women.
Ahmed NU; Haber G; Semenya KA; Hargreaves MK
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Jul; 19(7):1790-8. PubMed ID: 20587669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.
Myers RE; Sifri R; Hyslop T; Rosenthal M; Vernon SW; Cocroft J; Wolf T; Andrel J; Wender R
Cancer; 2007 Nov; 110(9):2083-91. PubMed ID: 17893869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized controlled trial comparing three invitation strategies in a breast cancer screening program.
Segura JM; Castells X; Casamitjana M; Macià F; Porta M; Katz SJ
Prev Med; 2001 Oct; 33(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 11570837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of patient and provider reminders on mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening in a large health maintenance organization.
Somkin CP; Hiatt RA; Hurley LB; Gruskin E; Ackerson L; Larson P
Arch Intern Med; 1997 Aug 11-25; 157(15):1658-64. PubMed ID: 9250226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of direct mail as a population-based strategy to increase mammography use among low-income underinsured women ages 40 to 64 years.
Slater JS; Henly GA; Ha CN; Malone ME; Nyman JA; Diaz S; McGovern PG
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Oct; 14(10):2346-52. PubMed ID: 16214915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Office systems for promoting screening mammography. A survey of primary care practices.
Melville SK; Luckmann R; Coghlin J; Gann P
J Fam Pract; 1993 Dec; 37(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 8245808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Family physicians' initiative to increase compliance with screening mammography--an innovative community project.
Eilat-Tsanani S; Sorek M; Gay N; Chaimovitch O; Kulton L; Tabenkin H
Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Dec; 3(12):920-4. PubMed ID: 11794915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proactive screening mammography counseling within the Cancer Information Service: results from a randomized trial.
Marcus AC; Bastani R; Reardon K; Karlins S; Das IP; Van Herle MP; McClatchey MW; Crane LA
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1993; (14):119-29. PubMed ID: 8123349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mailings timed to patients' appointments: a controlled trial of fecal occult blood test cards.
Goldberg D; Schiff GD; McNutt R; Furumoto-Dawson A; Hammerman M; Hoffman A
Am J Prev Med; 2004 Jun; 26(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 15165660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-visit-based cancer screening using a novel population management system.
Atlas SJ; Zai AH; Ashburner JM; Chang Y; Percac-Lima S; Levy DE; Chueh HC; Grant RW
J Am Board Fam Med; 2014; 27(4):474-85. PubMed ID: 25002002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women.
Crane LA; Leakey TA; Ehrsam G; Rimer BK; Warnecke RB
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Sep; 9(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 11008910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician and patient characteristics associated with outpatient breast cancer screening recommendations in the United States: analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data 1996-2004.
Bhosle M; Samuel S; Vosuri V; Paskett E; Balkrishnan R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 May; 103(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17028978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
