These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17389740)

  • 21. Development of an LCD-Based Visual Field System.
    Joo JH; Lee J; You H; Kang J
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Jan; 33(3):e19. PubMed ID: 29215806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Prospective randomized comparative study of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma].
    Kampmeier J; Eisert B; Buchwald HJ; Lang GK; Lang GE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Mar; 218(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 11322052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of a Head-mounted Virtual Reality Visual Field Screening Device.
    Mees L; Upadhyaya S; Kumar P; Kotawala S; Haran S; Rajasekar S; Friedman DS; Venkatesh R
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Feb; 29(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 31790067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the visual field test of Glaufield Lite with Humphrey Field Analyser.
    Behera G; Waghmare SV; Ramasamy A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):557-565. PubMed ID: 35947251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Correlation of macular thickness with visual fields in glaucoma patients and suspects.
    Mathers K; Rosdahl JA; Asrani S
    J Glaucoma; 2014 Feb; 23(2):e98-104. PubMed ID: 23661046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Advanced Vision Analyzer-Virtual Reality Perimeter: Device Validation, Functional Correlation and Comparison with Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Narang P; Agarwal A; Srinivasan M; Agarwal A
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Jun; 1(2):100035. PubMed ID: 36249304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pattern electroretinogram and automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Neoh C; Kaye SB; Brown M; Ansons AM; Wishart P
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1994 May; 78(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 8025069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Schaumberger M; Schäfer B; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1390-7. PubMed ID: 7775117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The repeatability of mean defect with size III and size V standard automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Doyle CK; Zamba KD; Artes P; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1345-51. PubMed ID: 23341012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.
    Dengler-Harles M; Wild JM; Cole MD; O'Neill EC
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 231(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 8339949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Conversion formulas between automated-perimetry indexes as measured by two different types of instrument.
    Papp A; Kis K; Németh J
    Ophthalmologica; 2001; 215(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 11244336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Anderson criteria in early glaucomatous visual field defects with the SITA Standard].
    Suzumura H; Yoshikawa K; Kimura T; Yamazaki S
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2011 May; 115(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 21706836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Anatomy of a supergroup: does a criterion of normal perimetric performance generate a supernormal population?
    Anderson AJ; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 44(11):5043-8. PubMed ID: 14578433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects].
    Reiser EM; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 1486263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retest Variability in the Medmont M700 Automated Perimeter.
    Pearce JG; Maddess T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 93(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 26760578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measuring visual function in age-related macular degeneration with frequency-doubling (matrix) perimetry.
    Anderson AJ; Johnson CA; Werner JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 88(7):806-15. PubMed ID: 21478785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An objective evaluation of gaze tracking in Humphrey perimetry and the relation with the reproducibility of visual fields: a pilot study in glaucoma.
    Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):8149-52. PubMed ID: 25389198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison between relative dispersion analysis of high-pass resolution perimetry and standard threshold perimetry.
    Iester M; Altieri M; Capris P; Zingirian M; Traverso CE
    Eye (Lond); 2000 Oct; 14 Pt 5():742-6. PubMed ID: 11116696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Usefulness of Gaze Tracking as an Index of Visual Field Reliability in Glaucoma Patients.
    Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Oct; 56(11):6233-6. PubMed ID: 26431476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.