These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17390747)

  • 1. New pharmacoeconomic option in uremic anemia management.
    Savica V; Mantovani L; Santoro D; Ricciardi B; Bellinghieri G
    Clin Nephrol; 2007 Mar; 67(3):200. PubMed ID: 17390747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Darbepoetin alpha is highly cost-effective compared with epoetin alpha in the treatment of renal anemia: a brief report from a hemodialysis clinic in Japan.
    Nakagawa T
    Ther Apher Dial; 2008 Dec; 12(6):531-2. PubMed ID: 19140854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epoetins and [symbol: see text] darbepoetin alfa in malignant disease.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2004 Mar; 42(3):21-3. PubMed ID: 15038080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of methodological approach on cost findings in comparison of epoetin alfa with darbepoetin alfa.
    Song X; Long SR; Marder WD; Sullivan SD; Kallich J
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Jul; 43(7):1203-10. PubMed ID: 19584392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Questionable conclusions about epoetin alfa.
    Kruse MW; Lee JJ
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2007 Sep; 64(17):1789-90; author reply 1790-1. PubMed ID: 17724355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comment: Epoetin alfa versus darbepoetin alfa for cancer patients with treatment-related anemia.
    Yang MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2006 May; 40(5):998-9; author reply 999. PubMed ID: 16670351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-related anemia in cancer patients in Sweden: comparative analysis of drug utilization, costs, and hematologic response.
    Persson U; Borg S; Jansson S; Ekman T; Franksson L; Friesland S; Larsson AM
    Adv Ther; 2005; 22(3):208-24. PubMed ID: 16236682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic evaluation of weekly epoetin alfa versus biweekly darbepoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anaemia: evidence from a 16-week randomised trial.
    Reed SD; Radeva JI; Daniel DB; Mody SH; Forlenza JB; McKenzie RS; Schulman KA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(5):479-94. PubMed ID: 16706573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comments on Clinical and economic comparison of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa.
    Vanscoy GJ
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Sep; 20(9):1459-60; author reply 1462-3. PubMed ID: 15383195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use and cost of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with cancer.
    Daniel G; Hurley D; Whyte JL; Willey V; Wilson M; Kallich J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jul; 25(7):1775-84. PubMed ID: 19505205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Therapeutic interchange of darbepoetin alfa for epoetin alfa in a multiinstitution health care system.
    Adamson R; Lew I; Allen P; Misuro A; Malacrida P
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2005 Nov; 62(22):2416-9. PubMed ID: 16278336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reimbursement for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents poses challenges.
    Traynor K
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2008 Mar; 65(5):385-6. PubMed ID: 18281727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Considerations in darbepoetin alfa cost and reimbursement: a model for pharmacy managers.
    Anderson ER; Gibson G
    Pharmacotherapy; 2003 Dec; 23(12 Pt 2):119S-124S. PubMed ID: 14695001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comments on Clinical and economic comparison of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa.
    Sullivan SD
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Sep; 20(9):1461; author reply 1462-3. PubMed ID: 15487107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comment: the impact of methodological approach on cost findings in comparison of epoetin alfa with darbepoetin alfa.
    Lefebvre P; Vekeman F; Cremieux PY
    Ann Pharmacother; 2010 Mar; 44(3):595; author reply 595-6. PubMed ID: 20179253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A star rises, another fades.
    Neumann ME
    Nephrol News Issues; 2013 Jul; 27(8):8. PubMed ID: 23926618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Propensity score matched assessment of treatment patterns and cost of erythropoiesis stimulating agent treatment in patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Tunceli O; Bailey RA; Stephenson JJ; Singer J
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2013 Dec; 19(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 23235918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of cancer-associated anemia.
    Bohlius J; Engert A; Schwarzer G
    JAMA; 2008 Dec; 300(24):2854-5; author reply 2855-7. PubMed ID: 19109112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and economic comparison of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa.
    Morreale A; Plowman B; DeLattre M; Boggie D; Schaefer M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Mar; 20(3):381-95. PubMed ID: 15025847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should all patients with chronic kidney disease receive an EPO-type drug?
    Berns JS
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2006 Mar; 73(3):298-300. PubMed ID: 16548453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.