BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17391189)

  • 1. Optimizing allocation of management resources for wildlife.
    Marsh H; Dennis A; Hines H; Kutt A; McDonald K; Weber E; Williams S; Winter J
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):387-99. PubMed ID: 17391189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.
    Joseph LN; Maloney RF; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 19183202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species.
    Mace GM; Collar NJ; Gaston KJ; Hilton-Taylor C; Akçakaya HR; Leader-Williams N; Milner-Gulland EJ; Stuart SN
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1424-42. PubMed ID: 18847444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rates of movement of threatened bird species between IUCN red list categories and toward extinction.
    Brooke Mde L; Butchart SH; Garnett ST; Crowley GM; Mantilla-Beniers NB; Stattersfield AJ
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):417-27. PubMed ID: 18402584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Haig SM; Beever EA; Chambers SM; Draheim HM; Dugger BD; Dunham S; Elliott-Smith E; Fontaine JB; Kesler DC; Knaus BJ; Lopes IF; Loschl P; Mullins TD; Sheffield LM
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1584-94. PubMed ID: 17181793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal allocation of conservation resources to species that may be extinct.
    Rout TM; Heinze D; McCarthy MA
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1111-8. PubMed ID: 20214673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates.
    Grenyer R; Orme CD; Jackson SF; Thomas GH; Davies RG; Davies TJ; Jones KE; Olson VA; Ridgely RS; Rasmussen PC; Ding TS; Bennett PM; Blackburn TM; Gaston KJ; Gittleman JL; Owens IP
    Nature; 2006 Nov; 444(7115):93-6. PubMed ID: 17080090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Threatened species and the potential loss of phylogenetic diversity: conservation scenarios based on estimated extinction probabilities and phylogenetic risk analysis.
    Faith DP
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1461-70. PubMed ID: 18798854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing decision rules for categorizing species' extinction risk to help develop quantitative listing criteria for the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Regan TJ; Taylor BL; Thompson GG; Cochrane JF; Ralls K; Runge MC; Merrick R
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):821-31. PubMed ID: 23646933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Building on IUCN regional red lists to produce lists of species of conservation priority: a model with Irish bees.
    Fitzpatrick U; Murray TE; Paxton RJ; Brown MJ
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 17883497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Participatory planning of interventions to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts.
    Treves A; Wallace RB; White S
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1577-87. PubMed ID: 19459896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inferring national and regional declines of rare orchid species with probabilistic models.
    Duffy KJ; Kingston NE; Sayers BA; Roberts DL; Stout JC
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 18798858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Economic valuation of biodiversity conservation: the meaning of numbers.
    Martín-López B; Montes C; Benayas J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):624-35. PubMed ID: 18410400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confronting uncertainty and missing values in environmental value transfer as applied to species conservation.
    Akter S; Grafton RQ
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1407-17. PubMed ID: 20337683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When should we save the most endangered species?
    Wilson HB; Joseph LN; Moore AL; Possingham HP
    Ecol Lett; 2011 Sep; 14(9):886-90. PubMed ID: 21749599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of basic biological information for rapid prediction of the response of species to habitat loss.
    Hockey PA; Curtis OE
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 18759778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land.
    Knight AT; Cowling RM; Difford M; Campbell BM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1348-58. PubMed ID: 20345404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elemental conservation units: communicating extinction risk without dictating targets for protection.
    Wood CC; Gross MR
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 18254851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cutting the cake: supporting environmental fund allocation decisions.
    Hajkowicz S
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2737-45. PubMed ID: 19375214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.