These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17391202)
1. Area-based refinement for selection of reserve sites with the benefit-function approach. Arponen A; Kondelin H; Moilanen A Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 17391202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conservation goals and the relative importance of costs and benefits in reserve selection. Perhans K; Kindstrand C; Boman M; Djupström LB; Gustafsson L; Mattsson L; Schroeder LM; Weslien J; Wikberg S Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1331-9. PubMed ID: 18637912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The boundary-quality penalty: a quantitative method for approximating species responses to fragmentation in reserve selection. Moilanen A; Wintle BA Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):355-64. PubMed ID: 17391186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Logic for designing nature reserves for multiple species. McCarthy MA; Thompson CJ; Williams NS Am Nat; 2006 May; 167(5):717-27. PubMed ID: 16671015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ecological-niche modeling and prioritization of conservation-area networks for Mexican herpetofauna. Urbina-Cardona JN; Flores-Villela O Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1031-41. PubMed ID: 20345399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biased data reduce efficiency and effectiveness of conservation reserve networks. Grand J; Cummings MP; Rebelo TG; Ricketts TH; Neel MC Ecol Lett; 2007 May; 10(5):364-74. PubMed ID: 17498135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species. Nicholson E; Westphal MI; Frank K; Rochester WA; Pressey RL; Lindenmayer DB; Possingham HP Ecol Lett; 2006 Sep; 9(9):1049-60. PubMed ID: 16925654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the effectiveness of reserve acquisition programs in protecting rare and threatened species. Turner WR; Wilcove DS; Swain HM Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1657-69. PubMed ID: 17181801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Projected impacts of climate change on a continent-wide protected area network. Hole DG; Willis SG; Pain DJ; Fishpool LD; Butchart SH; Collingham YC; Rahbek C; Huntley B Ecol Lett; 2009 May; 12(5):420-31. PubMed ID: 19379136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transferability of species distribution models: a functional habitat approach for two regionally threatened butterflies. Vanreusel W; Maes D; Van Dyck H Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):201-12. PubMed ID: 17298526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reserve selection using nonlinear species distribution models. Moilanen A Am Nat; 2005 Jun; 165(6):695-706. PubMed ID: 15937749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Terrestrial reserve networks do not adequately represent aquatic ecosystems. Herbert ME; McIntyre PB; Doran PJ; Allan JD; Abell R Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1002-11. PubMed ID: 20337671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposed conservation landscape for giant pandas in the Minshan Mountains, China. Shen G; Feng C; Xie Z; Ouyang Z; Li J; Pascal M Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1144-53. PubMed ID: 18954340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of incremental reserve design and changing reservation goals on the long-term efficiency of reserve systems. Stewart RR; Ball IR; Possingham HP Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):346-54. PubMed ID: 17391185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human impacts on regional avian diversity and abundance. Lepczyk CA; Flather CH; Radeloff VC; Pidgeon AM; Hammer RB; Liu J Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):405-16. PubMed ID: 18294300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Environmental service payments: evaluating biodiversity conservation trade-offs and cost-efficiency in the Osa Conservation Area, Costa Rica. Barton DN; Faith DP; Rusch GM; Acevedo H; Paniagua L; Castro M J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):901-11. PubMed ID: 18423841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A biological framework for evaluating whether a species is threatened or endangered in a significant portion of its range. Waples RS; Adams PB; Bohnsack J; Taylor BL Conserv Biol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):964-74. PubMed ID: 17650247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the value of the umbrella-species concept for conservation planning with meta-analysis. Branton M; Richardson JS Conserv Biol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 21091767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]