BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17391660)

  • 1. Two-year-olds use artist intention to understand drawings.
    Preissler MA; Bloom P
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):512-8. PubMed ID: 17391660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Was it designed to do that? Children's focus on intended function in their conceptualization of artifacts.
    Asher YM; Kemler Nelson DG
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):474-83. PubMed ID: 17331491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Young children show representational flexibility when interpreting drawings.
    Allen ML; Nurmsoo E; Freeman N
    Cognition; 2016 Feb; 147():21-8. PubMed ID: 26605962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Children's understanding of action lines and the static representation of speed of locomotion.
    Gross D; Soken N; Rosengren KS; Pick AD; Pillow BH; Melendez P
    Child Dev; 1991 Oct; 62(5):1124-41. PubMed ID: 1756658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-classification and category representation in children's concepts.
    Nguyen SP
    Dev Psychol; 2007 May; 43(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 17484583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diversity-based reasoning in children.
    Heit E; Hahn U
    Cogn Psychol; 2001 Dec; 43(4):243-73. PubMed ID: 11741343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks: evidence for early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism.
    Pritchard VE; Neumann E
    Dev Psychol; 2004 Mar; 40(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 14979760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Children's use of mutual exclusivity to learn labels for parts of objects.
    Hansen MB; Markman EM
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Mar; 45(2):592-6. PubMed ID: 19271842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When a Picasso is a "Picasso": the entry point in the identification of visual art.
    Belke B; Leder H; Harsanyi G; Carbon CC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 20035909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors responsible for performance on the day-night task: response set or semantics?
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):360-71. PubMed ID: 15985070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults.
    Minda JP; Desroches AS; Church BA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual distinctiveness and the development of children's false memories.
    Howe ML
    Child Dev; 2008; 79(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 18269509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Action speaks louder than words: young children differentially weight perceptual, social, and linguistic cues to learn verbs.
    Brandone AC; Pence KL; Golinkoff RM; Hirsh-Pasek K
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(4):1322-42. PubMed ID: 17650141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developmental changes in the effect of dimensional salience on the discriminability of object relations.
    Thompson LA; Markson L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1998 Jul; 70(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 9679077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Object categorisation, object naming, and viewpoint independence in visual remembering: evidence from young children's drawings of a novel object.
    Walker P; Gavin Bremner J; Smart L; Pitt T; Apsey D
    Memory; 2008; 16(6):626-36. PubMed ID: 18569689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Young children associate novel words with complex objects rather than salient parts.
    Hollich G; Golinkoff RM; Hirsh-Pasek K
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Sep; 43(5):1051-61. PubMed ID: 17723035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of category-based induction: reexamining conclusions from the induction then recognition (ITR) paradigm.
    Hayes BK; McKinnon R; Sweller N
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Sep; 44(5):1430-41. PubMed ID: 18793074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-year-olds exclude novel objects as potential referents of novel words based on pragmatics.
    Grassmann S; Stracke M; Tomasello M
    Cognition; 2009 Sep; 112(3):488-93. PubMed ID: 19616205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of animal recognition: a difference between Parts and Wholes.
    Davidoff J; Roberson D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Mar; 81(3):217-34. PubMed ID: 11884088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for an age-independent process in category learning.
    Livingston KR; Andrews JK
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15985065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.