These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1739169)

  • 1. Mum's the word: the Supreme Court and family planning.
    Mariner WK
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Feb; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 1739169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Law, medicine, and the "gag rule".
    Ball JR
    Ann Intern Med; 1991 Sep; 115(5):403-4. PubMed ID: 1863032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech.
    Weeks AB
    North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Government funding in Title X projects: circumscribing the constitutional rights of the indigent: Rust v. Sullivan.
    Maher L
    Calif West Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):143-82. PubMed ID: 11656260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New York v. Sullivan.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Fed Report; 1989 Nov; 889():401-18. PubMed ID: 11648392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rust v. Sullivan.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1991 May; 111():1759-89. PubMed ID: 12041295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Chastity Act: government manipulation of abortion information and the First Amendment.
    Benshoof J
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101(8):1916-37. PubMed ID: 10288540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rust v. Sullivan: triumph of the right over reason.
    Call EC
    J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):123-42. PubMed ID: 11656449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion law today.
    Field MA
    J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The discourse ethics alternative to Rust v. Sullivan.
    Leedes GC
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1991; 26(1):87-143. PubMed ID: 11659547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How the doctor got gagged. The disintegrating right of privacy in the physician-patient relationship.
    Sugarman J; Powers M
    JAMA; 1991 Dec; 266(23):3323-7. PubMed ID: 1960832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Title X family planning gag rule: can the government buy up constitutional rights?
    Chervin CI
    Stanford Law Rev; 1989 Jan; 41(2):401-34. PubMed ID: 11655926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Massachusetts v. Secretary of Health and Human Services.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    Fed Report; 1990 Mar; 899():53-79. PubMed ID: 11648391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Celebrating the Bill of Rights in the year of Rust v. Sullivan.
    Murphy E
    Nurs Outlook; 1991; 39(5):238-9. PubMed ID: 1896319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Souter questions a curb on doctors: Justices skeptical of federal bar to advice on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 11647430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Five justices uphold U.S. rule curbing abortion advice Some clinics to still advise but forgo aid.
    Greenhouse L; Brozan N
    N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11647436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment.
    Shapiro AA
    Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How the doctor got gagged.
    Archer WR
    JAMA; 1992 Jul; 268(1):50; author reply 51. PubMed ID: 1608105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.