These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17393970)

  • 1. Ethical attitudes of nurse, physician, and unaffiliated members of institutional review boards.
    Rothstein WG; Phuong LH
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2007; 39(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 17393970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Too Many Rationales, Not Enough Reason: A Call to Examine the Goals of Including Lay Members on Institutional Review Boards.
    Solomon S
    Account Res; 2016; 23(1):4-22. PubMed ID: 26528638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Cross Sectional Survey of Recruitment Practices, Supports, and Perceived Roles for Unaffiliated and Non-scientist Members of IRBs.
    Nicholls SG; Taylor HA; James R; Anderson EE; Friesen P; Schonfeld T; Summers EI
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2023; 14(3):174-184. PubMed ID: 36821084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Common (mis)perceptions about IRB review of human subjects research.
    Lynn MR; Nelson DK
    Nurs Sci Q; 2005 Jul; 18(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 15976051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Members of the same club": challenges and decisions faced by US IRBs in identifying and managing conflicts of interest.
    Klitzman R
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22796. PubMed ID: 21829516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
    Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
    PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economies of scale in institutional review boards.
    Wagner TH; Cruz AM; Chadwick GL
    Med Care; 2004 Aug; 42(8):817-23. PubMed ID: 15258484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research.
    Wolf LE; Croughan M; Lo B
    Med Care; 2002 Jun; 40(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 12021678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Policies and management of conflicts of interest within medical research institutional review boards: results of a national study.
    Vogeli C; Koski G; Campbell EG
    Acad Med; 2009 Apr; 84(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 19318786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research consent by adolescent minors and institutional review boards.
    Mammel KA; Kaplan DW
    J Adolesc Health; 1995 Nov; 17(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 8924437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical review in Pakistan: the credibility gap.
    Jafarey AM; Iqbal SP; Hassan M
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Dec; 62(12):1354-7. PubMed ID: 23866494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members.
    Stryjewski TP; Kalish BT; Silverman B; Lehmann LS
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26564945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Faculty guide to the institutional review board process.
    Kaktins NM
    Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(6):244-8. PubMed ID: 19901736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regional perspectives in research ethics: a report from Bangladesh.
    Harun-Ar-Rashid
    East Mediterr Health J; 2006; 12 Suppl 1():S66-72. PubMed ID: 17037691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.
    Pech C; Cob N; Cejka JT
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 22(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18042949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical schools' attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of central institutional review boards.
    Loh ED; Meyer RE
    Acad Med; 2004 Jul; 79(7):644-51. PubMed ID: 15234914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perspectives of Singaporean biomedical researchers and research support staff on actual and ideal IRB review functions and characteristics: A quantitative analysis.
    Labude MK; Shen L; Zhu Y; Schaefer GO; Ong C; Xafis V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0241783. PubMed ID: 33382683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethics committees. Research ethics: beyond the guidelines.
    Macpherson CC
    Dev World Bioeth; 2001 May; 1(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 12870511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.