187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17394885)
1. Durability of amalgam in the restoration of class II cavities in primary molars: a systematic review of the literature.
Kilpatrick NM; Neumann A
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2007 Mar; 8(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17394885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature.
Chadwick BL; Evans DJ
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2007 Mar; 8(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 17394886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation.
Duggal MS; Toumba KJ; Sharma NK
Br Dent J; 2002 Sep; 193(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 12368893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
De Moor R; Delmé K
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
Hickel R; Kaaden C; Paschos E; Buerkle V; García-Godoy F; Manhart J
Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns.
Sonmez D; Duruturk L
Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):E18; discussion 408-9. PubMed ID: 20448584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of gallium and amalgam alloys in primary molars.
Singh R; Tandon S; Rakhee M
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Jun; 22(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 15491089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results.
Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM; Yip HK; Smales RJ
Int Dent J; 2004 Feb; 54(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15005472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Amalgam fillings in the deciduous and mixed dentition--a post-treatment evaluation of service life and quality].
Pieper K; Beinhauer A; Redeker M
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Sep; 46(9):606-8. PubMed ID: 1817941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam.
Sharif MO; Merry A; Catleugh M; Tickle M; Brunton P; Dunne SM; Aggarwal VR; Chong LY
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD005970. PubMed ID: 24510713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
Hickel R; Manhart J
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study on the survival of primary molars with intact and with defective restorations.
Hilgert LA; Frencken JE; de Amorim RG; Mulder J; Leal SC
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 26(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 26567086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors producing failure of class II silver amalgam restorations in primary molars.
Myers DR
ASDC J Dent Child; 1977; 44(3):226-9. PubMed ID: 325041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
