These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17394886)

  • 1. Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature.
    Chadwick BL; Evans DJ
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2007 Mar; 8(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 17394886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP
    J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of microleakage between bulk esthetic materials versus resin-modified glass ionomer to restore Class II cavities in primary molars.
    Gopinath VK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(3):238-243. PubMed ID: 28762350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
    Hübel S; Mejàre I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation.
    Croll TP; Bar-Zion Y; Segura A; Donly KJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 11575018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars.
    Gaintantzopoulou MD; Gopinath VK; Zinelis S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 27165307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of cavity preparation and lamination on bond strength and fracture of tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.
    Suwatviroj P; Messer LB; Palamara JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 14733466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
    Ersin NK; Candan U; Aykut A; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Class II Vitremer restoration of primary molars.
    Croll TP; Helpin ML
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 7775678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars.
    Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 34(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 19953810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars.
    Folkesson UH; Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW
    Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10371000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-year evaluation of class II resin-modified glass ionomer cement/composite open sandwich and composite restorations.
    Vilkinis V; Hörsted-Bindslev P; Baelum V
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 11000317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Atraumatic restorative treatment with resin-modified glass ionomer material: short-term results of a pilot study.
    Dülgergil CT; Soyman M; Civelek A
    Med Princ Pract; 2005; 14(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 15961941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical behaviour of glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB; Tornes KH; Alvheim H
    J Dent; 1999 Aug; 27(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 10399410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.