These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17394911)

  • 1. In vitro effect of load cycling on metal-ceramic cement- and screw-retained implant restorations.
    Karl M; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 17394911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of load cycling on metal ceramic screw-retained implant restorations with unrestored and restored screw access holes.
    Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18182181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structural changes in ceramic veneered three-unit implant-supported restorations as a consequence of static and dynamic loading.
    Karl M; Fischer H; Graef F; Wichmann MG; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 17669484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic-veneered superstructures.
    Karl M; Rosch S; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15798682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns.
    Al-Omari WM; Shadid R; Abu-Naba'a L; El Masoud B
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jun; 19(4):263-73. PubMed ID: 20136704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw- versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis.
    Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Traini T; Di lorio D; Caputi S
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 16564081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
    Kinsel RP; Lin D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.
    Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs.
    Guichet DL; Caputo AA; Choi H; Sorensen JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 10795456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo stress behavior in cemented and screw-retained five-unit implant FPDs.
    Karl M; Taylor TD; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16433647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 15248882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A technique for locating implant abutment screws of posterior cement-retained metal-ceramic restorations with ceramic occlusal surfaces.
    Schwedhelm ER; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 16473092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts.
    Lee A; Okayasu K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20147811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of an occlusal screw-access hole on the fracture resistance of permanently cemented implant crowns: a laboratory study.
    Shadid RM; Abu-Naba'a L; Al-Omari WM; Asfar KR; El Masoud BM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 21519576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures.
    Karl M; Winter W; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 14982352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations.
    Nissan J; Narobai D; Gross O; Ghelfan O; Chaushu G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1102-7. PubMed ID: 22010095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro stress analyses of dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses.
    Kim WD; Jacobson Z; Nathanson D
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 10635156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design.
    Preiskel HW; Tsolka P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 14982360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.