BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17396141)

  • 21. [Quality assured HER2 analysis in breast cancer. Important therapeutic predictive and prognostic factor].
    Fernö M; Haglund M; Bendahl PO; Olsson H; Rydén L
    Lakartidningen; 2008 Aug 6-19; 105(32-33):2181-4. PubMed ID: 18780693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 immunohistochemistry predict clinical outcome after first-line trastuzumab plus taxane chemotherapy in patients with HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive metastatic breast cancer.
    Kim JW; Kim JH; Im SA; Kim YJ; Han HS; Kim JS; Lee KH; Kim TY; Han SW; Jeon YK; Oh DY; Kim TY; Park IA
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2013 Jul; 72(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 23673443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Institutional quality assurance for breast cancer HER2 immunohistochemical testing: identification of outlier results and impact of simultaneous fluorescence in situ hybridization cotesting.
    Green IF; Zynger DL
    Hum Pathol; 2015 Dec; 46(12):1842-9. PubMed ID: 26412217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of TMA for interlaboratory validation of FISH testing for detection of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
    Diaz LK; Gupta R; Kidwai N; Sneige N; Wiley EL
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2004 Apr; 52(4):501-7. PubMed ID: 15034001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer].
    Ivković-Kapicl T; Knezević-Usaj S
    Med Pregl; 2010; 63(1-2):69-74. PubMed ID: 20873313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What causes discrepancies in HER2 testing for breast cancer? A Japanese ring study in conjunction with the global standard.
    Umemura S; Osamura RY; Akiyama F; Honma K; Kurosumi M; Sasano H; Toyoshima S; Tsuda H; Rüschoff J; Sakamoto G
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 19019764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Determination of HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and concordance with the clinical trials immunohistochemical assay in women with metastatic breast cancer evaluated for treatment with trastuzumab.
    Dybdal N; Leiberman G; Anderson S; McCune B; Bajamonde A; Cohen RL; Mass RD; Sanders C; Press MF
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Sep; 93(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 16184453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. HER2 immunohistochemistry staining positivity is strongly predictive of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 positive breast cancer.
    Zhao J; Krishnamurti U; Zhang C; Meisel J; Wei Z; Suo A; Aneja R; Li Z; Li X
    Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Nov; 216(11):153155. PubMed ID: 32871536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new rabbit monoclonal antibody (4B5) for the immunohistochemical (IHC) determination of the HER2 status in breast cancer: comparison with CB11, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and interlaboratory reproducibility.
    Powell WC; Hicks DG; Prescott N; Tarr SM; Laniauskas S; Williams T; Short S; Pettay J; Nagle RB; Dabbs DJ; Scott KM; Brown RW; Grogan T; Roche PC; Tubbs RR
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2007 Mar; 15(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 17536315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laboratory compliance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing guidelines: a 3-year comparison of validation procedures.
    Dyhdalo KS; Fitzgibbons PL; Goldsmith JD; Souers RJ; Nakhleh RE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jul; 138(7):876-84. PubMed ID: 24978913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of quantitative immunofluorescence with conventional methods for HER2/neu testing with respect to response to trastuzumab therapy in metastatic breast cancer.
    Giltnane JM; Molinaro A; Cheng H; Robinson A; Turbin D; Gelmon K; Huntsman D; Rimm DL
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Oct; 132(10):1635-47. PubMed ID: 18834223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of HER2 detection methods between central and regional laboratories in Greece.
    Papadopoulos S; Kouvatseas G; Skarlos D; Malamos N; Delliou E; Saratsiotou I; Ardavanis A; Mavroudis D; Skarpidi E; Arapantoni P; Karyda I; Patakioyta F; Aravantinos G; Razis E; Fountzilas G; Kosmidis P
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2007 Oct; 7(10):784-90. PubMed ID: 18021480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. HER2--a discussion of testing approaches in the USA.
    Thor A
    Ann Oncol; 2001; 12 Suppl 1():S101-7. PubMed ID: 11521714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prospective multi-centre study to validate chromogenic in situ hybridisation for the assessment of HER2 gene amplification in specimens from adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer patients.
    Riethdorf S; Hoegel B; John B; Ott G; Fritz P; Thon S; Loening T; Pantel K
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 137(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 20396915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Concordance between local and central laboratory HER2 testing in the breast intergroup trial N9831.
    Roche PC; Suman VJ; Jenkins RB; Davidson NE; Martino S; Kaufman PA; Addo FK; Murphy B; Ingle JN; Perez EA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(11):855-7. PubMed ID: 12048274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Real-world performance of HER2 testing--National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience.
    Paik S; Bryant J; Tan-Chiu E; Romond E; Hiller W; Park K; Brown A; Yothers G; Anderson S; Smith R; Wickerham DL; Wolmark N
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(11):852-4. PubMed ID: 12048273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.
    Wang B; Ding W; Sun K; Wang X; Xu L; Teng X
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16726. PubMed ID: 31723206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Updated UK Recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer.
    Rakha EA; Pinder SE; Bartlett JM; Ibrahim M; Starczynski J; Carder PJ; Provenzano E; Hanby A; Hales S; Lee AH; Ellis IO;
    J Clin Pathol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 25488926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. HER2+ breast cancer: review of biologic relevance and optimal use of diagnostic tools.
    Hicks DG; Kulkarni S
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Feb; 129(2):263-73. PubMed ID: 18208807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of HER2 in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (NCCTG N9831, BCIRG 006, and BCIRG 005).
    Perez EA; Press MF; Dueck AC; Jenkins RB; Kim C; Chen B; Villalobos I; Paik S; Buyse M; Wiktor AE; Meyer R; Finnigan M; Zujewski J; Shing M; Stern HM; Lingle WL; Reinholz MM; Slamon DJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Feb; 138(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 23420271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.