These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1739711)

  • 41. Power and meaninglessness.
    Bogduk N
    Pain Med; 2012 Feb; 13(2):148-9. PubMed ID: 22313497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Are reporting standards of diagnostic test evaluation unrealistic?
    Lassere M
    J Rheumatol; 2010 Feb; 37(2):220-2. PubMed ID: 20147476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Standards of acceptance for surgical procedures.
    Spodick DH; Aronow W; Barber B; Blackburn H; Boyd D; Conti CR; LoGerfo JP; Lown B; Mathur VS; McIntosh HD; Preston TA; Selzer A; Takaro T
    Can J Surg; 1978 Sep; 21(5):382. PubMed ID: 719560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Editorial double standards?
    Taylor MA
    Am J Psychiatry; 1978 Dec; 135(12):1572. PubMed ID: 717590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. National Center for Health Statistics Data Presentation Standards for Proportions.
    Parker JD; Talih M; Malec DJ; Beresovsky V; Carroll M; Gonzalez JF; Hamilton BE; Ingram DD; Kochanek K; McCarty F; Moriarity C; Shimizu I; Strashny A; Ward BW
    Vital Health Stat 2; 2017 Aug; (175):1-22. PubMed ID: 30248016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. IPEG guideline on statistical design and analysis for pharmacodynamic trials. International Pharmaco-EEG Group.
    Ferber G; Abt K; Fichte K; Luthringer R
    Neuropsychobiology; 1999; 39(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 10072666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Scientists rise up against statistical significance.
    Amrhein V; Greenland S; McShane B
    Nature; 2019 Mar; 567(7748):305-307. PubMed ID: 30894741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
    Evans RG; Su DF
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Emerging standards in statistical practice: implications for clinical trials in rehabilitation medicine.
    Millis SR
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S32-7. PubMed ID: 14502037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Science watchers wink at the logic].
    Taube A
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(16):1549-53; discussion 1553-5. PubMed ID: 8667757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
    Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Statisticians' advice to obstetricians.
    Thom E; Das A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 178(1 Pt 1):192-3. PubMed ID: 9465829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Phase I/II--design and analysis.
    Coleman WP; Woodbury-Harris KM; Coull BM
    Front Neurol Neurosci; 2009; 25():52-54. PubMed ID: 19478496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Commentary.
    Breslow NE
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):379-80. PubMed ID: 20538870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Can we trust "Magnitude-based inference"?
    Nevill AM; Williams AM; Boreham C; Wallace ES; Davison GW; Abt G; Lane AM; Winter EM
    J Sports Sci; 2018 Dec; 36(24):2769-2770. PubMed ID: 30392465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reproducible research and the substantive context.
    Keiding N
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):376-8. PubMed ID: 20498225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Discussion of Keiding.
    Peng RD
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):393-4. PubMed ID: 20538876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Presentation of statistical analysis in the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association].
    Aamodt G; Gulbrandsen P; Laake P; Aavitsland P; Bretthauer M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Aug; 125(16):2183-7. PubMed ID: 16138131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Measures of effect size in the reporting of rehabilitation research.
    Ottenbacher KJ; Barrett KA
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1989 Apr; 68(2):52-8. PubMed ID: 2649115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A critical review of papers from clinical cancer research.
    Skovlund E
    Acta Oncol; 1998; 37(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 9743455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.