These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1739711)

  • 61. Statistical reviewing for disability and rehabilitation.
    Rigby AS
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(7):515-21. PubMed ID: 18608415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Should there be statistical guidelines for medical research papers?
    Biometrics; 1978 Dec; 34(4):687-95. PubMed ID: 749952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.
    Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Facing a fast-changing world with "no change".
    Zhu W
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2014 Dec; 85(4):427-8. PubMed ID: 25412122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Accountability.
    Reiss CS
    DNA Cell Biol; 2012 Nov; 31(11):1571. PubMed ID: 23098332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Statistical standards in journal articles.
    McLoughlin PD
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2012 May; 40(3):556; author reply 556. PubMed ID: 22577924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. In research, good ideas are not enough!
    Am J Occup Ther; 1980 Jan; 34(1):47. PubMed ID: 7369077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The need for standards, not guidelines, in biological data reporting and sharing.
    Burgoon LD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1369-73. PubMed ID: 17093486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Does a well-done analysis of poor-quality data constitute evidence of benefit?
    Barie PS
    Ann Surg; 2012 Jun; 255(6):1030-1. PubMed ID: 22549753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Confidence intervals.
    Murray GD
    Nucl Med Commun; 1989 Jun; 10(6):387-8. PubMed ID: 2771303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Research methods and The Bone & Joint Journal.
    Costa ML; Stengel D; Griffin XL; Carey Smith R; Parsons N
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Jan; 95-B(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 23307665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Type I error in headache research.
    Houle TT; Turner DP; Penzien DB
    Headache; 2013; 53(7):1031-3. PubMed ID: 23773114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Statistical and clinical significance.
    Connelly LM
    Medsurg Nurs; 2014; 23(2):118-9. PubMed ID: 24933790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Recommendations for depression publications.
    Kupfer DJ; Rush AJ
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1983 Sep; 40(9):1031. PubMed ID: 6615148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!
    Heddle NM; Ness P
    Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Computational medicinal chemistry.
    Stahl M; Bajorath J
    J Med Chem; 2011 Jan; 54(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 20973560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. What is research?
    Glatstein E
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Oct; 51(2):288-90. PubMed ID: 11567800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Numerology.
    Dauter Z; Baker T
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2007 Mar; 63(Pt 3):275. PubMed ID: 17327662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Research reporting: clarity and accuracy improve quality.
    Green T
    Can J Neurosci Nurs; 2010; 32(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 21268487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Leading the way: guidance to quality scientific reporting.
    Nelson CJ; Roberts J
    J Sex Med; 2010 Jun; 7(6):1983-1984. PubMed ID: 20929510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.