These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17397744)

  • 1. Validity of the keratometric index: large population-based study.
    Fam HB; Lim KL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):686-91. PubMed ID: 17397744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity of the keratometric index: evaluation by the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera.
    Ho JD; Tsai CY; Tsai RJ; Kuo LL; Tsai IL; Liou SW
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 18165094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consideration of the posterior corneal curvature for assessment of corneal power after myopic LASIK.
    Langenbucher A; Torres F; Behrens A; Suarez E; Haigis W; Seitz B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):264-9. PubMed ID: 15115446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Estimation of preoperative corneal power in patients with myopic LASIK based on postoperative corneal data measured from Orbscan II].
    Cai JQ; Zhang JY; Yang SH; Cha Y; Shi MG
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 47(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 21426846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of Orbscan II posterior corneal curvature measurement for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Leyland M
    Eye (Lond); 2004 Apr; 18(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 15069429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical validation of an algorithm to correct the error in the keratometric estimation of corneal power in normal eyes.
    Piñero DP; Camps VJ; Mateo V; Ruiz-Fortes P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1333-8. PubMed ID: 22814040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corneal refractive power and its associations with ocular and general parameters: the Central India Eye and Medical Study.
    Jonas JB; Nangia V; Sinha A; Gupta R
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Sep; 118(9):1805-11. PubMed ID: 21665279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Algorithm for correcting the keratometric estimation error in normal eyes.
    Camps VJ; Pinero Llorens DP; de Fez D; Coloma P; Caballero MT; Garcia C; Miret JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Feb; 89(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 22105333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the ocular refractive components: the Reykjavik Eye Study.
    Olsen T; Arnarsson A; Sasaki H; Sasaki K; Jonasson F
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Jun; 85(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 17286626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of error in radius of curvature on the corneal power measurement before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia.
    Liu Y; Wang Y; Wang Z; Zuo T
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Jul; 32(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 22697216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: Estimating the corneal refractive power.
    Awwad ST; Manasseh C; Bowman RW; Cavanagh HD; Verity S; Mootha V; McCulley JP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1070-6. PubMed ID: 18571071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus.
    Piñero DP; Alió JL; Alesón A; Escaf Vergara M; Miranda M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):814-25. PubMed ID: 20457375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of chronic diabetes mellitus on the thickness and the shape of the anterior and posterior surface of the cornea.
    Wiemer NG; Dubbelman M; Kostense PJ; Ringens PJ; Polak BC
    Cornea; 2007 Dec; 26(10):1165-70. PubMed ID: 18043169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in ocular dimensions and refraction with accommodation.
    Garner LF; Yap MK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 9135807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeatability of corneal power and wavefront aberration measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug Placido corneal topographer.
    Wang L; Shirayama M; Koch DD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 20202540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corneal power measurement with a rotating Scheimpflug imaging system after Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    Prasher P; Muftuoglu O; Bowman RW; Cavanagh HD; McCulley JP; Mootha VV
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1358-64. PubMed ID: 20656160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of Orbscan II topography measurements in relation to refractive status.
    Rabsilber TM; Becker KA; Auffarth GU
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1607-13. PubMed ID: 16129300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the anterior structures of eyes in a normal Northern Thai group using the Orbscan II.
    Tananuvat N; Pansatiankul N
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Nov; 88 Suppl 9():S105-13. PubMed ID: 16681061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distribution of ocular biometric parameters and refraction in a population-based study of Australian children.
    Ojaimi E; Rose KA; Morgan IG; Smith W; Martin FJ; Kifley A; Robaei D; Mitchell P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 46(8):2748-54. PubMed ID: 16043846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corneal elevation indices in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Fam HB; Lim KL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1281-7. PubMed ID: 16863962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.