BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17397794)

  • 1. The effects of obesity on lifting performance.
    Xu X; Mirka GA; Hsiang SM
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Jan; 39(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 17397794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Body mass as a factor in stature change.
    Rodacki AL; Fowler NE; Provensi CL; Rodacki Cde L; Dezan VH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):799-805. PubMed ID: 16005554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of horizontal load speed and lifting frequency on lifting technique and biomechanics.
    Dai B; Jin S; Ning X; Mirka GA
    Ergonomics; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1024-32. PubMed ID: 20658396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments.
    Lavender SA; Li YC; Andersson GB; Natarajan RN
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 9973875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of lifting tasks performed on laterally slanted ground surfaces.
    Jiang Z; Shin G; Freeman J; Reid S; Mirka GA
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(7):782-95. PubMed ID: 16076737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-back loading in lifting two loads beside the body compared to lifting one load in front of the body.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Bakker AJ; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19084840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of obesity on the biomechanics of walking at different speeds.
    Browning RC; Kram R
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Sep; 39(9):1632-41. PubMed ID: 17805097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Obesity and workers' compensation: results from the Duke Health and Safety Surveillance System.
    Ostbye T; Dement JM; Krause KM
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 Apr; 167(8):766-73. PubMed ID: 17452538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Injury-induced kinematic compensations within the lower back: impact of non-lower back injuries.
    Davis KG; Seol H
    Ergonomics; 2005 Feb; 48(2):135-49. PubMed ID: 15764313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of obesity on accurate and rapid arm movement performed from a standing posture.
    Berrigan F; Simoneau M; Tremblay A; Hue O; Teasdale N
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2006 Dec; 30(12):1750-7. PubMed ID: 16619057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Obesity does not reduce maximum acceptable weights of lift.
    Singh D; Park W; Levy MS
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18501874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working height, block mass and one- vs. two-handed block handling: the contribution to low back and shoulder loading during masonry work.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Kuijer PP; van der Molen HF; Hoozemans MJ; Frings-Dresen MH; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2009 Sep; 52(9):1104-18. PubMed ID: 19787512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of sinusoidal rolling ground motion on lifting biomechanics.
    Ning X; Mirka GA
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Dec; 42(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 20591409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low back pain and lifting: a review of epidemiology and aetiology.
    Cole MH; Grimshaw PN
    Work; 2003; 21(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 14501095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiating lifting technique between those who develop low back pain and those who do not.
    Wrigley AT; Albert WJ; Deluzio KJ; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 15698697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of ship motion on spinal loading during manual lifting.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Delleman NJ; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2008 Sep; 51(9):1426-40. PubMed ID: 18802823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbosacral compression in maximal lifting efforts in sagittal plane with varying mechanical disadvantage in isometric and isokinetic modes.
    Kumar S
    Ergonomics; 1994 Dec; 37(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 7828579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is the trunk movement more perturbed after an asymmetric than after a symmetric perturbation during lifting?
    van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2004 Jul; 37(7):1071-7. PubMed ID: 15165877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age related differences in mechanical demands imposed on the lower back by manual material handling tasks.
    Shojaei I; Vazirian M; Croft E; Nussbaum MA; Bazrgari B
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):896-903. PubMed ID: 26556714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of lifting belt use on multijoint motion and load bearing during repetitive and asymmetric lifting.
    Sparto PJ; Parnianpour M; Reinsel TE; Simon S
    J Spinal Disord; 1998 Feb; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 9493771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.