145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17397855)
1. Systematic errors in analytical measurement results.
Hibbert DB
J Chromatogr A; 2007 Jul; 1158(1-2):25-32. PubMed ID: 17397855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment of bias in estimating measurement uncertainty.
O'Donnell GE; Hibbert DB
Analyst; 2005 May; 130(5):721-9. PubMed ID: 15852143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the residual liquid junction potential contribution to the uncertainty in pH measurement: a case study on low ionic strength natural waters.
Kadis R; Leito I
Anal Chim Acta; 2010 Apr; 664(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 20363394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The meaning of the bias uncertainty measure.
Bartley DL
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 18535088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for both random errors and systematic errors in uncertainty propagation analysis of computer models involving experimental measurements with Monte Carlo methods.
Vasquez VR; Whiting WB
Risk Anal; 2005 Dec; 25(6):1669-81. PubMed ID: 16506991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncertainty evaluation in the chloroquine phosphate potentiometric titration: application of three different approaches.
Rodomonte AL; Montinaro A; Bartolomei M
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2006 Sep; 42(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 16870384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A bottom-up approach in estimating the measurement uncertainty and other important considerations for quantitative analyses in drug testing for horses.
Leung GN; Ho EN; Kwok WH; Leung DK; Tang FP; Wan TS; Wong AS; Wong CH; Wong JK; Yu NH
J Chromatogr A; 2007 Sep; 1163(1-2):237-46. PubMed ID: 17628571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of insignificant bias and its uncertainty on the coverage probability of uncertainty intervals Part 1. Evaluation for a given value of the true bias.
Synek V
Talanta; 2006 Dec; 70(5):1024-34. PubMed ID: 18970877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of insignificant bias and its uncertainty on the coverage probability of uncertainty intervals Part 2. Evaluation for a found insignificant experimental bias.
Synek V
Talanta; 2007 Feb; 71(3):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19071450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uncertainty in liquid chromatographic analysis of pharmaceutical product: influence of various uncertainty sources.
Leito S; Mölder K; Künnapas A; Herodes K; Leito I
J Chromatogr A; 2006 Jul; 1121(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 16756985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bias in analytical chemistry: A review of selected procedures for incorporating uncorrected bias into the expanded uncertainty of analytical measurements and a graphical method for evaluating the concordance of reference and test procedures.
Frenkel R; Farrance I; Badrick T
Clin Chim Acta; 2019 Aug; 495():129-138. PubMed ID: 30935874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian decision threshold, detection limit and confidence limits in ionising-radiation measurement.
Weise K; Hübel K; Rose E; Schläger M; Schrammel D; Täschner M; Michel R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 16868015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Recommendations for expressing uncertainty of measurement of quantitative results in laboratory medicine].
Giroud C; Dumontet M; Vassault A; Braconnier F; Férard G;
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2007; 65(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 17353174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of methods for the estimation of measurement uncertainty for an analytical method for sulphonamides.
Dabalus Islam M; Schweikert Turcu M; Cannavan A
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2008 Dec; 25(12):1439-50. PubMed ID: 19680854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of uncorrected measurement bias in uncertainty estimation for chemical measurements.
Magnusson B; Ellison SL
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2008 Jan; 390(1):201-13. PubMed ID: 18026721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of illicit drugs in seized materials: role of sampling and analysis in estimation of measurement uncertainty.
Zamengo L; Frison G; Gregio M; Orrù G; Sciarrone R
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):108-23. PubMed ID: 21159455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved evaluation of measurement uncertainty from sampling by inclusion of between-sampler bias using sampling proficiency testing.
Ramsey MH; Geelhoed B; Wood R; Damant AP
Analyst; 2011 Apr; 136(7):1313-21. PubMed ID: 21279235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complete equation for the measurement of organic molecules using stable isotope labeled internal standards, exact matching, and mass spectrometry.
Burke DG; Mackay LG
Anal Chem; 2008 Jul; 80(13):5071-8. PubMed ID: 18517220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian modeling of measurement errors and pesticide concentration in dietary risk assessments.
Kennedy M; Hart A
Risk Anal; 2009 Oct; 29(10):1427-42. PubMed ID: 19645757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
