These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17397855)

  • 21. Uncertainty in spectrophotometric analysis--"error propagation break up", a novel statistical method for uncertainty management.
    Amanatidou E; Trikoilidou E; Tsikritzis L; Foteini K
    Talanta; 2011 Oct; 85(5):2385-90. PubMed ID: 21962657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attempts to include uncorrected bias in the measurement uncertainty.
    Synek V
    Talanta; 2005 Feb; 65(4):829-37. PubMed ID: 18969876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measurement uncertainty.
    Meyer VR
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Jul; 1158(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 17359984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The 2007 International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM), JCGM 200:2008 [ISO/IEC Guide 99]: Meeting the need for intercontinentally understood concepts and their associated intercontinentally agreed terms.
    De Bièvre P
    Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 42(4-5):246-8. PubMed ID: 19863914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of the uncertainty budget for the amperometric measurement of dissolved oxygen.
    Fisicaro P; Adriaens A; Ferrara E; Prenesti E
    Anal Chim Acta; 2007 Jul; 597(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 17658315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Systematic and non-systematic effects of the uncertainty of the sample position in gamma-ray spectrometry.
    Vidmar T; Korun M
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2004; 61(2-3):401-4. PubMed ID: 15177378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Systematic selection bias: a cause of dramatic errors in the inference of treatment effectiveness.
    Dawn AG; Balkrishnan R; Feldman SR
    J Dermatolog Treat; 2008; 19(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 18484425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Uncertainty evaluation of human risk analysis (HRA) of chemicals by multiple exposure routes.
    Sassi G; Ruggeri B
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1343-56. PubMed ID: 18684163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty of glucose in clinical chemistry.
    Berçik Inal B; Koldas M; Inal H; Coskun C; Gümüs A; Döventas Y
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Apr; 1100():223-6. PubMed ID: 17460183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Numerical bias estimation for mass spectrometric mass isotopomer analysis.
    Yang TH; Bolten CJ; Coppi MV; Sun J; Heinzle E
    Anal Biochem; 2009 May; 388(2):192-203. PubMed ID: 19275875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of uncertainty in size-exclusion chromatography with a double detection system (light-scattering and refractive index).
    Oliva A; Llabrés M; Fariña JB
    Talanta; 2009 May; 78(3):781-9. PubMed ID: 19269428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in analytical assays by means of Monte-Carlo simulation.
    Angeles Herrador M; González AG
    Talanta; 2004 Oct; 64(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 18969620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of the measurement uncertainty of methamphetamine and amphetamine in hair analysis.
    Lee S; Park Y; Yang W; Han E; Choe S; Lim M; Chung H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Mar; 185(1-3):59-66. PubMed ID: 19179027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimation of measurement uncertainties using virtual fringe projection technique.
    Haskamp K; Kästner M; Ohrt C; Reithmeier E
    Appl Opt; 2012 Apr; 51(10):1516-20. PubMed ID: 22505069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dielectric measurement: error analysis and assessment of uncertainty.
    Gabriel C; Peyman A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6033-46. PubMed ID: 17110768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comment on 'Empirical versus modelling approaches to the estimation of measurement uncertainty caused by primary sampling' by J. A. Lyn, M. H. Ramsey, A. P. Damant and R. Wood.
    Geelhoed B
    Analyst; 2009 Sep; 134(9):1934-5; discussion 1936. PubMed ID: 19684922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Uncertainty of measurement for competitive and indirect ELISAs.
    Toussaint JF; Assam P; Caij B; Dekeyser F; Knapen K; Imberechts H; Goris N; Molenberghs G; Mintiens K; De Clercq K
    Rev Sci Tech; 2007 Dec; 26(3):649-56. PubMed ID: 18293613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Uncertainty estimation in seismo-acoustic reflection travel time inversion.
    Dettmer J; Dosso SE; Holland CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):161-76. PubMed ID: 17614476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A study of the conditions of measurement required to evaluate bias in analytical results illustrated by the use of data from a multi-round, blind-duplicated, proficiency test.
    O'Donnell GE; Hibbert DB
    Analyst; 2013 Jul; 138(13):3673-8. PubMed ID: 23702715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Allowable limits of analytical error which can guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2008 Jul; 56(7):617-21. PubMed ID: 18709995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.