These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
707 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17397926)
1. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma. Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma. Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma? Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ability of short-wavelength automated perimetry to predict conversion to glaucoma. van der Schoot J; Reus NJ; Colen TP; Lemij HG Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19896194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis. Sakai T; Matsushima M; Shikishima K; Kitahara K Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma. Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry. Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Bengtsson B; Heijl A Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT. Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma]. Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry. Horn FK; Brenning A; Jünemann AG; Lausen B J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 17570999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prospective randomized comparative study of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma]. Kampmeier J; Eisert B; Buchwald HJ; Lang GK; Lang GE Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Mar; 218(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 11322052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients. Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma. Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss. Fan X; Wu LL; Ma ZZ; Xiao GG; Liu F Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of cataract on the results of frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Tanna AP; Abraham C; Lai J; Shen J Ophthalmology; 2004 Aug; 111(8):1504-7. PubMed ID: 15288979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma. Chan KC; Poostchi A; Wong T; Insull EA; Sachdev N; Wells AP Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 17716733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]