These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17398319)

  • 1. A new pattern electroretinogram paradigm evaluated in terms of user friendliness and agreement with perimetry.
    Yang A; Swanson WH
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Apr; 114(4):671-9. PubMed ID: 17398319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between pattern electroretinogram, standard automated perimetry, and optic nerve structural assessments.
    Sehi M; Pinzon-Plazas M; Feuer WJ; Greenfield DS
    J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(8):608-17. PubMed ID: 19826390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma patients with a range of severity of disease with the new glaucoma paradigm.
    Fredette MJ; Anderson DR; Porciatti V; Feuer W
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):957-63. PubMed ID: 17976726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection.
    Bowd C; Vizzeri G; Tafreshi A; Zangwill LM; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Mar; 116(3):437-43. PubMed ID: 19167080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normative data for a user-friendly paradigm for pattern electroretinogram recording.
    Porciatti V; Ventura LM
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jan; 111(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 14711729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restoration of retinal ganglion cell function in early glaucoma after intraocular pressure reduction: a pilot study.
    Ventura LM; Porciatti V
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15629815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeatability of pattern electroretinogram measurements using a new paradigm optimized for glaucoma detection.
    Bowd C; Tafreshi A; Vizzeri G; Zangwill LM; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Aug; 18(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 19680050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast sensitivity perimetry and clinical measures of glaucomatous damage.
    Swanson WH; Malinovsky VE; Dul MW; Malik R; Torbit JK; Sutton BM; Horner DG
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 91(11):1302-11. PubMed ID: 25259758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and evaluation of a contrast sensitivity perimetry test for patients with glaucoma.
    Hot A; Dul MW; Swanson WH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 49(7):3049-57. PubMed ID: 18378580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Parisi V; Miglior S; Manni G; Centofanti M; Bucci MG
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):216-28. PubMed ID: 16406535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.
    Tan JCK; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Phu J
    Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optic disc imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: variability and agreement study with Heidelberg retinal tomograph.
    Yang B; Ye C; Yu M; Liu S; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Sep; 119(9):1852-7. PubMed ID: 22572035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between static automated and scanning laser entoptic perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Plummer DJ; Lopez A; Azen SP; LaBree L; Bartsch DU; Sadun AA; Freeman WR
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1693-701. PubMed ID: 10964832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma.
    Budenz DL; Michael A; Chang RT; McSoley J; Katz J
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 15629813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.