These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17399890)
1. New procedures are bound to modify our attitude in facing urologic cancers in the near future: are we ready for a cost-effectiveness analysis? Colombo R Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 17399890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share? Kaye DR; Mullins JK; Carter HB; Bivalacqua TJ Nat Rev Urol; 2015 Jan; 12(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 25535000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. News briefs on diagnostics, treatment modalities, and medications. Gaines KK Urol Nurs; 2003 Oct; 23(5):369-70. PubMed ID: 14621362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The practice of urologic oncology: some economic realties. Loughlin KR Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(4 Suppl):S5-9. PubMed ID: 22795080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical observations on the cost-effectiveness relationship in endoscopic surgery on the lower urinary tract]. Proca E; Lucan M; Sinescu I; Georgescu G Rev Chir Oncol Radiol O R L Oftalmol Stomatol Chir; 1988; 37(3):161-72. PubMed ID: 2971992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic surgery in urologic oncology: gathering the evidence. Skolarus TA; Zhang Y; Hollenbeck BK Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2010 Aug; 10(4):421-32. PubMed ID: 20715919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The cost of urogynaecological treatments: which are more cost-effective? Foote AJ; Moore KH Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jun; 47(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 17550494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From the many to the few: changes in urological cancer surgery provision. Nuttall M; van der Meulen J; Emberton M Br J Cancer; 2005 Mar; 92(5):797-8. PubMed ID: 15756249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Current world literature. Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Mar; 22(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 22297787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical practices for urological tumors: a nation-wide survey in Japan in 2005. Kawakami S; Kihara K; ; Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):257-62; discussion 262. PubMed ID: 19215318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Economical aspects on the treatments of urolithiasis by surgical methods: comparison of surgical method selections and world status]. Kageyama S; Nagata M; Aoki T; Takayama T; Hayami S; Ushiyama T; Suzuki K; Ozono S; Fujita K Hinyokika Kiyo; 2004 Aug; 50(8):587-90. PubMed ID: 15471082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New guidelines help measure cost-effectiveness. Smith AJ Minn Med; 1995 Jul; 78(7):36. PubMed ID: 7651294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Pediatric urology]. Stief CG; Karl A Urologe A; 2016 Jan; 55(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 26676724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction to a new series: advanced topics in evidence-based urologic oncology. Canfield SE; Dahm P Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(4):446. PubMed ID: 21726794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What's new in urology. Thrasher JB J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Sep; 201(3):438-48. PubMed ID: 16125079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of patient-reported outcome measures in reconstructive urology. Jackson MJ; N'Dow J; Pickard R Curr Opin Urol; 2010 Nov; 20(6):495-9. PubMed ID: 20625297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Re: Surgical practices for urological tumors: a nation-wide survey in Japan in 2005. Kawakami S; Kihara K Int J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):429. PubMed ID: 19416410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]